Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34392386›Full record

Observational studyOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2022

One- and 2-year incidence of osteoporotic fracture: a multi-cohort observational study using routinely collected real-world data.

Sara Khalid, Carlen Reyes, Martin Ernst, Antonella Delmestri, Emese Toth, Cesar Libanati, Bo Abrahamsen, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Incidence of first and subsequent fractures in multiple myeloma patients: a parallel cohort study using UK CPRD dataset.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trends in incidence of recorded diagnosis of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and fragility fractures in people aged 50 years and above: retrospective cohort study using UK primary care data.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
  7. Impact of Stroke History on the Risk of Recurrent Hip Fracture or Major Osteoporotic Fractures among Patients with Incident Hip Fracture: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Sara KhalidNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
Carlen ReyesFundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a ÍAtenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gorina (IDIAPJ Gol), CIBERFES, Barcelona, Spain.
Martin ErnstDepartment of Public Health, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Antonella DelmestriNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
Emese TothUCB Biopharma Sprl, Brussels, Belgium.
Cesar LibanatiUCB Biopharma Sprl, Brussels, Belgium.
Bo AbrahamsenNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
Daniel Prieto-AlhambraNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK. Daniel.prietoalhambra@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3950-6346
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUCB Pharma (Belgium) · BEUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We estimated and characterized the imminent fracture risk (1-2 years) of high-risk fracture patients through a multinational (UK, Spain, Denmark) cohort study. Older individuals with newly diagnosed osteoporosis and individuals who had a fracture while on treatment with a bisphosphonate were at a high risk of imminent fracture. PURPOSE: To characterize and estimate 1- to 2-year fracture risk in high-risk fracture patients.

methodsMulti-cohort study in (database/study period) UK (CPRD/1995-2017), Spain (SIDIAP/2006-2016) and Denmark (DHR/1995-2016) including individuals ≥ 50 years old in NDO (newly diagnosed osteoporosis), OFx (incident osteoporotic fracture), BP (incident oral bisphosphonates use) or FWOT (fracture while on treatment with bisphosphonates). Outcomes (ICD-10/READ): hip, clinical spine, non-hip, non-spine and hip/humerus/distal forearm fracture. FOLLOW-UP: from cohort entry until death, migration/transfer or end of the study. STATISTICS: baseline characteristics and incidence rate (IR per 1000 persons). RESULTS (1-YEAR IR): NDO included 69,899 (UK), 37,901 (Spain) and 158,191 (Denmark) individuals. Spanish-IR was lowest for hip (4.7), clinical spine (2.5) and major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (17.3) and highest in Denmark (74.2, 26.0 and 120.1, respectively). OFx included 83,514 (UK), 51,044 (Spain) and 509,551 (Denmark) individuals. IR in Denmark was highest for hip (24.1) and MOF (47.2), in Spain was highest for the clinical spine (9.4) and lowest for hip (9.5) and in the UK was lowest for the clinical spine (2.8) and MOF (20.7). BP included 148,507 (UK), 52,037 (Spain) and 204,010 (Denmark) individuals. Spanish-IR was lowest for hip (5.0) and MOF (21.1) and highest in Denmark (20.3 and 48.6, respectively). FWOT included 28,930 (UK), 1,865 (Spain) and 31,882 (Denmark) individuals. Clinical spine-IR was highest for Spain (12.0). Hip-IR was lowest for Spain (7.6) and highest for Denmark (33.6). Comparing young subjects, those who have FWOT started with an increased fracture rate.

conclusionOFx and FWOT individuals experience higher re-fracture incidence rates than those with osteoporosis with or without treatment.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesCohort StudiesHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedRisk FactorsAnti-resorptiveFracture preventionGeneral population studiesOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID34392386
PMCPMC8758600
OpenAlexW3183473053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.