Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34392335›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2022

Sex-specific differences and postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive and sternotomy valve surgery.

Marco Moscarelli, Roberto Lorusso, Gianni D Angelini, Nicola Di Bari, Domenico Paparella, Khalil Fattouch, Alberto Albertini, Giuseppe Nasso, Francesca Fiorentino, Giuseppe Speziale

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Marco MoscarelliDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, GVM Care & Research, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8373-8486
Roberto LorussoCardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart & Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1777-2045
Gianni D AngeliniDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Nicola Di BariDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, GVM Care & Research, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Domenico PaparellaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, GVM Care & Research, Santa Maria Hospital, Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2261-7098
Khalil FattouchDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, GVM Care & Research, Maria Eleonora Hospital, Palermo, Italy.
Alberto AlbertiniDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, GVM Care & Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5374-4298
Giuseppe NassoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, GVM Care & Research, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Francesca FiorentinoDepartment of Surgery and Cancer and Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Giuseppe SpezialeDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, GVM Care & Research, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Imperial College London · GBMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMaria Cecilia Hospital · ITMaria Eleonora Hospital · ITSanta Maria Nuova Hospital · ITUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/1992027/7163Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFemale sex is an established risk factor for postoperative complications after heart surgery, but the influence of sex on outcomes after minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) for valvular replacement/repair remains controversial. We examined whether the role of sex as a risk factor varies by surgical approach [MICS vs conventional sternotomy (ST)] and further assessed outcomes among female patients including in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications by surgical approach.

methodsWe analysed data from a multicentre registry for patients who underwent isolated aortic valve and mitral surgery with MICS or ST. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Propensity score matching was used to minimize between-group differences.

resultsAmong the 15 155 patients included in the study, 7674 underwent MICS (50.6%). Female sex was equally distributed in the MICS and ST groups (47.3% vs 47.6%, respectively). Risk for surgery was higher in the ST group than in the MICS group {EuroSCORE II: 4.0 [standard deviation (SD): 6.8] vs 3.7 [SD: 6.4]; P = 0.005}, including among female patients only [ST vs MICS 4.6 (SD: 6.9) vs 4.2 (SD: 6.3); P = 0.04]. Mortality did not significantly vary by procedure among women [MICS vs ST, 2.4% vs 2.8%; hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 0.71-1.73; P (surgical approach × sex) = 0.51]. The results also did not vary after adjusting for confounders.

conclusionsFemale sex was associated with higher mortality in patients undergoing valve surgery, regardless of surgical approach. In female patients, MICS did not provide any benefits over ST in terms of in-hospital deaths or postoperative complications. SUBJECT COLLECTION: 117, 125.

Indexed as

Heart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationSternotomyAortic ValveFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFemale sexMinimally invasive surgeryPostoperative mortalityPostoperative outcomes

Identifiers

PMID34392335
PMCPMC8858592
OpenAlexW3196222656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.