Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34392331›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2021

Sacubitril-valsartan as a treatment for apparent resistant hypertension in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.

Alice M Jackson, Pardeep S Jhund, Inder S Anand, Hans-Dirk Düngen, Carolyn S P Lam, Marty P Lefkowitz, Gerard Linssen, Lars H Lund, Aldo P Maggioni, Marc A Pfeffer and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01920711 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01920711 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients (NYHA Class II-IV) With Preserved Ejection Fraction (PARAGON-HF)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2014 to 2019Enrolled4,822ConditionsHeart Failure With Preserved Ejection FractionArmsLCZ696, Valsartan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor for the treatment of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Vericiguat on C-reactive Protein Level and Prognosis in Patients with Hypertensive Heart Failure.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. 2024 Thai guidelines on the treatment of hypertension.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. ANMCO position paper: diagnosis and treatment of heart failure with preserved systolic function.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 11 countries.

Alice M JacksonBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0364-1271
Pardeep S JhundBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4306-5317
Inder S AnandUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1308-4963
Hans-Dirk DüngenDepartment of Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Carolyn S P LamNational Heart Center Singapore and Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Marty P LefkowitzNovartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8830-6316
Gerard LinssenDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Group Twente, Almelo and Hengelo, The Netherlands.
Lars H LundDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Heart and Vascular Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1411-4482
Aldo P MaggioniMaria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2764-6779
Marc A PfefferCardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jean L RouleauInstitut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Jose F K SaraivaDisciplina de Cardiologia Faculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3345-8862
Michele SenniCardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Orly VardenyMinneapolis VA Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Magnus O WijkmanDepartment of Internal Medicine and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4757-9051
Mehmet B YilmazDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8169-8628
Yoshihiko SaitoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Michael R ZileMedical University of South Carolina and the Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA.
Scott D SolomonCardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
John J V McMurrayBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6317-3975
British Heart Foundation · GBBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Minnesota · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDokuz Eylül University · TRKarolinska University Hospital · SELinköping University · SEMaria Cecilia Hospital · ITMedical University of South Carolina · USMontreal Heart Institute · CANara Medical University · JPNovartis (United States) · USOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITPontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas · BRUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLZiekenhuis Groep Twente · NL

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/18/14/33330British Heart Foundation RE/18/6/34217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPatients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) frequently have difficult-to-control hypertension. We examined the effect of neprilysin inhibition on 'apparent resistant hypertension' in patients with HFpEF in the PARAGON-HF trial, which compared the effect of sacubitril-valsartan with valsartan. METHODS AND

resultsIn this post hoc analysis, patients were categorized according to systolic blood pressure at the end of the valsartan run-in (n = 4795). 'Apparent resistant hypertension' was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg (≥135 mmHg if diabetes) despite treatment with valsartan, a calcium channel blocker, and a diuretic. 'Apparent mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA)-resistant' hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg (≥135 mmHg if diabetes) despite the above treatments and an MRA. The primary outcome in the PARAGON-HF trial was a composite of total hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes. We examined clinical endpoints and the safety of sacubitril-valsartan according to the hypertension category. We also examined reductions in blood pressure from the end of valsartan run-in to Weeks 4 and 16 after randomization. Overall, 731 patients (15.2%) had apparent resistant hypertension and 135 (2.8%) had apparent MRA-resistant hypertension. The rate of the primary outcome was higher in patients with apparent resistant hypertension [17.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 15.6-19.1 per 100 person-years] compared to those with a controlled systolic blood pressure (13.4; 12.7-14.3 per 100 person-years), with an adjusted rate ratio of 1.28 (95% CI 1.05-1.57). The reduction in systolic blood pressure at Weeks 4 and 16, respectively, was greater with sacubitril-valsartan vs. valsartan in patients with apparent resistant hypertension [-4.8 (-7.0 to -2.5) and 3.9 (-6.6 to -1.3) mmHg] and apparent MRA-resistant hypertension [-8.8 (-14.0 to -3.5) and -6.3 (-12.5 to -0.1) mmHg]. The proportion of patients with apparent resistant hypertension achieving a controlled systolic blood pressure by Week 16 was 47.9% in the sacubitril-valsartan group and 34.3% in the valsartan group [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43]. In patients with apparent MRA-resistant hypertension, the respective proportions were 43.6% vs. 28.4% (adjusted OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.18-5.89).

conclusionSacubitril-valsartan may be useful in treating apparent resistant hypertension in patients with HFpEF, even in those who continue to have an elevated blood pressure despite treatment with at least four antihypertensive drug classes, including an MRA. CLINICAL

trial registrationPARAGON-HF: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01920711.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHypertensionAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsHumansNeprilysinStroke VolumeTetrazolesTreatment OutcomeValsartanAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationsNeprilysinsacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combinationTetrazolesValsartanBlood pressureHeart failurePreserved ejection fractionSacubitril–valsartan

Identifiers

PMID34392331
PMCPMC8455346
OpenAlexW3193922103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.