Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34392047›Full record

ArticleJournal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences2021

A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of primary aromatic amines in human urine.

Sridhar Chinthakindi, Kurunthachalam Kannan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The MAK collection for occupational health and safety · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Short- and Long-Term Stability of Aromatic Amines in Human Urine.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Variability in urinary concentrations of primary aromatic amines.The Science of the total environment · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sridhar ChinthakindiDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Kurunthachalam KannanDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA. Electronic address: Kurunthachalam.kannan@nyulangone.org.
New York University · US

Funding

Wadsworth Center's Human Health and Exposure Analysis Resource (WC-HHEAR)U2CES026542 · NIEHS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI KANNAN, KURUNTHACHALAM, KANNAN, KURUNTHACHALAM · 2015 to 2025
$15.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES026542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aromatic amines are widely used in personal care products and human exposure to this class of chemicals is widespread. Bioanalytical methods to determine trace levels of aromatic amines in human urine are scarce. In this study, a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed to determine 39 primary aromatic amines (AAs) along with nicotine and cotinine in human urine. Chromatographic separation of the 41 analytes was achieved on an Ultra Biphenyl (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 5 µm) column. Mass spectrometry was operated in electrospray ionization positive ion multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The method exhibited excellent linear dynamic range (0.1-50 ng/mL) with correlation coefficients (r) > 0.999 for all analytes. Urine samples (2 mL) were hydrolyzed using 10 M NaOH at 95 °C for 15 h and target analytes were extracted using methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE). Addition of 15 µL of 0.25 M HCl to the sample extracts improved the recoveries of several target analytes. The method was validated through the analysis of fortified quality control (QC) samples and a certified standard reference material (SRM). Relative recoveries (%) of target analytes fortified in QC samples were in the range of 75-114% for 37 of the 41 analytes while the other analytes exhibited lower recoveries (16-74%). The limits of detection (LOD) and limits of quantification (LOQ) of target analytes were in the range of 0.025-0.20 ng/mL and 0.1-1.0 ng/mL, respectively. Intra-day and inter-day precision of the method assessed through the analysis of fortified urine QC samples at three different concentrations were < 11.7% and < 15.9% (measured as RSD), respectively. The method was applied in the analysis of urine samples from the general population and known smokers; aniline, para-anisidine, para-toluidine, ortho/meta-toluidine, 3-chloroaniline, 4-chloroaniline, 3,4-dichloroaniline, and 4,4'-methylenedianiline were found in all smoker's urine at sum concentrations ranging from 0.04 to 9.16 ng/mL.

Indexed as

Aniline CompoundsBiological MonitoringChromatography, LiquidHumansLimit of DetectionLinear ModelsReproducibility of ResultsSmokingTandem Mass SpectrometryAniline CompoundsAnilineAromatic aminesBiomonitoringLC-MS/MSUrine

Identifiers

PMID34392047
PMCPMC8429219
OpenAlexW3191690567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.