Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34391462›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2021

Incidental findings of typical iNPH imaging signs in asymptomatic subjects with subclinical cognitive decline.

Doortje C Engel, Lukas Pirpamer, Edith Hofer, Reinhold Schmidt, Cornelia Brendle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Doortje C EngelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. doortjeengel@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7044-5142
Lukas PirpamerClinical Division of Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Edith HoferClinical Division of Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Reinhold SchmidtClinical Division of Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Cornelia BrendleDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Medical University of Graz · ATUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe etiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) remains unclear. Little is known about the pre-symptomatic stage. This study aimed to investigate the association of neuropsychological data with iNPH-characteristic imaging changes compared to normal imaging and unspecific atrophy in a healthy population.

methodsWe extracted data from the community-dwelling Austrian Stroke Prevention Family Study (ASPS-Fam) database (2006-2010). All subjects underwent a baseline and identical follow-up examination after 3-5 years with MR imaging and an extensive neuropsychological test battery (Trail Making Test B, short physical performance balance, walking speed, memory, visuo-practical skills, composite scores of executive function and g-factor). We categorized the subjects into "iNPH"-associated, non-specific "atrophy," and "normal" based on the rating of different radiological cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space parameters. We noted how the categories developed over time. We assessed the association of the image categories with the neuropsychological data, different demographic, and lifestyle parameters (age, sex, education, alcohol intake, arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia), and the extent of white matter hyperintensities. We investigated whether neuropsychological data associated with the image categories were independent from other parameters as confounders.

resultsOne hundred and thirteen subjects, aged 50-70 years, were examined. The imaging category "iNPH" was only present at follow-up. A third of subjects with "atrophy" at baseline changed to the category "iNPH" at follow-up. More white matter hyperintensities (WMH) were present in later "iNPH" subjects. Subjects with "iNPH" performed worse than "normal" subjects on executive function (p = 0.0118), memory (p = 0.0109), and Trail Making Test B (TMT-B. p < 0.0001). Education, alcohol intake, diabetes, arterial hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia had no effect. Age, number of females, and the extent of white matter hyperintensities were higher in "iNPH" than in "normal" subjects but did not significantly confound the neuropsychological results.

conclusionsApparent asymptomatic subjects with "iNPH" imaging characteristics presented with subclinical cognitive decline and showed worse executive function, memory, and TMT-B results than "normal" subjects. WMH seem to play a role in the etiology before ventriculomegaly. Clinical screening of individuals with incidental iNPH-characteristic imaging and conspicuous results sof these neurocognitive tests needs further validation.

Indexed as

Asymptomatic DiseasesIncidental FindingsMental Status and Dementia TestsAgedCognitive DysfunctionCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydrocephalus, Normal PressureMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesEvans’ indexIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalusNeuropsychological testingShort physical performance balance testStand scoreTight high convexityTrail Making Test-B

Identifiers

PMID34391462
PMCPMC8364005
OpenAlexW3195481067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.