Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34391413›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Patients-centered SurvivorShIp care plan after Cancer treatments based on Big Data and Artificial Intelligence technologies (PERSIST): a multicenter study protocol to evaluate efficacy of digital tools supporting cancer survivors.

Izidor Mlakar, Simon Lin, Ilona Aleksandraviča, Krista Arcimoviča, Jānis Eglītis, Mārcis Leja, Ángel Salgado Barreira, Jesús G Gómez, Mercedes Salgado, Jesús G Mata and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Use of Chatbots in Oncological Care: A Narrative Review.International journal of general medicine · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Izidor MlakarFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Koroška cesta 46, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia. izidor.mlakar@um.si.ORCID 0000-0002-4910-1879
Simon LinData Science Department, Symptoma, Vienna, Austria.
Ilona AleksandravičaInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine of the University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Krista ArcimovičaRiga East Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Jānis EglītisRiga East Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Mārcis LejaInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine of the University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Ángel Salgado BarreiraSERGAS - Galician Healthcare Service, Galicia, Spain.
Jesús G GómezSERGAS - Galician Healthcare Service, Galicia, Spain.
Mercedes SalgadoSERGAS - Galician Healthcare Service, Galicia, Spain.
Jesús G MataSERGAS - Galician Healthcare Service, Galicia, Spain.
Doroteja BatorekUniverzitetni Klinicni Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Matej HorvatUniverzitetni Klinicni Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Maja MolanUniverzitetni Klinicni Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Maja RavnikUniverzitetni Klinicni Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Jean-François KauxPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Université de Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Valérie BleretService of Sénologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Catherine LolyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Didier MaquetPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Université de Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Elena SartiniCyberEthicsLab, Rome, Italy.
Urška SmrkeFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Koroška cesta 46, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 875406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is encouraging to see a substantial increase in individuals surviving cancer. Even more so since most of them will have a positive effect on society by returning to work. However, many cancer survivors have unmet needs, especially when it comes to improving their quality of life (QoL). Only few survivors are able to meet all of the recommendations regarding well-being and there is a body of evidence that cancer survivors' needs often remain neglected from health policy and national cancer control plans. This increases the impact of inequalities in cancer care and adds a dangerous component to it. The inequalities affect the individual survivor, their career, along with their relatives and society as a whole. The current study will evaluate the impact of the use of big data analytics and artificial intelligence on the self-efficacy of participants following intervention supported by digital tools. The secondary endpoints include evaluation of the impact of patient trajectories (from retrospective data) and patient gathered health data on prediction and improved intervention against possible secondary disease or negative outcomes (e.g. late toxicities, fatal events). METHODS/

designThe study is designed as a single-case experimental prospective study where each individual serves as its own control group with basal measurements obtained at the recruitment and subsequent measurements performed every 6 months during follow ups. The measurement will involve CASE-cancer, Patient Activation Measure and System Usability Scale. The study will involve 160 survivors (80 survivors of Breast Cancer and 80 survivors of Colorectal Cancer) from four countries, Belgium, Latvia, Slovenia, and Spain. The intervention will be implemented via a digital tool (mHealthApplication), collecting objective biomarkers (vital signs) and subjective biomarkers (PROs) with the support of a (embodied) conversational agent. Additionally, the Clinical Decision Support system (CDSS), including visualization of cohorts and trajectories will enable oncologists to personalize treatment for an efficient care plan and follow-up management. DISCUSSION: We expect that cancer survivors will significantly increase their self-efficacy following the personalized intervention supported by the m-HealthApplication compared to control measurements at recruitment. We expect to observe improvement in healthy habits, disease self-management and self-perceived QoL. Trial registration ISRCTN97617326. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN97617326 . Original Registration Date: 26/03/2021.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsArtificial IntelligenceBig DataFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSurvivorshipArtificial intelligenceCancer survivorsConversational agentDigital interventionHealth applicationQuality of lifeSingle-case experimental prospective studyWell-being

Identifiers

PMID34391413
PMCPMC8364016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.