Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34391391›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

HELLO: improved neural network architectures and methodologies for small variant calling.

Anand Ramachandran, Steven S Lumetta, Eric W Klee, Deming Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Applications for Deep Learning in Epilepsy Genetic Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anand Ramachandran *Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois At Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Steven S LumettaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois At Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Eric W KleeBiomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Deming ChenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois At Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA. dchen@illinois.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3016-0270

Funding

Division of Computer and Network Systems 1337732Division of Computer and Network Systems 1624790National Science Foundation 1725729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModern Next Generation- and Third Generation- Sequencing methods such as Illumina and PacBio Circular Consensus Sequencing platforms provide accurate sequencing data. Parallel developments in Deep Learning have enabled the application of Deep Neural Networks to variant calling, surpassing the accuracy of classical approaches in many settings. DeepVariant, arguably the most popular among such methods, transforms the problem of variant calling into one of image recognition where a Deep Neural Network analyzes sequencing data that is formatted as images, achieving high accuracy. In this paper, we explore an alternative approach to designing Deep Neural Networks for variant calling, where we use meticulously designed Deep Neural Network architectures and customized variant inference functions that account for the underlying nature of sequencing data instead of converting the problem to one of image recognition.

resultsResults from 27 whole-genome variant calling experiments spanning Illumina, PacBio and hybrid Illumina-PacBio settings suggest that our method allows vastly smaller Deep Neural Networks to outperform the Inception-v3 architecture used in DeepVariant for indel and substitution-type variant calls. For example, our method reduces the number of indel call errors by up to 18%, 55% and 65% for Illumina, PacBio and hybrid Illumina-PacBio variant calling respectively, compared to a similarly trained DeepVariant pipeline. In these cases, our models are between 7 and 14 times smaller.

conclusionsWe believe that the improved accuracy and problem-specific customization of our models will enable more accurate pipelines and further method development in the field. HELLO is available at https://github.com/anands-repo/hello.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNeural Networks, ComputerHumansINDEL MutationDeep learningDeep neural networksHybrid variant callingIlluminaPacBioVariant calling

Identifiers

PMID34391391
PMCPMC8364080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.