SynthesisTurkish journal of medical sciences2021
Rituximab for the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Synthesis in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of 12 immunosuppressive agents for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults: A pairwise and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Case Report: Subcutaneous ofatumumab for patients with immunosuppressant-dependent or ineffective primary membranous nephropathy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Risk assessment of pulmonary infections in primary glomerular diseases treated with rituximab.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Meta-analysis of the effects of CYP3A5*3 gene polymorphisms on tacrolimus blood concentration and effectiveness in Chinese patients with membranous nephropathy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Immunosuppressive therapy for progressive idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis in China.BMC health services research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: This meta-analysis comprehensively investigated the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). Materials and methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Registry of Controlled Trials databases from January 2000 to January 2020. Studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of RTX in the treatment of IMN with nephrotic syndrome (NS) were included. Results: Nine studies (total of 357 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled complete response and overall response (OR) rates at 12 months were 13.2% [95% con fidence interval (CI), 0.09–0.18] and 60% (95% CI, 0.48–0.72), and those at 24 months were 27.8% (95% CI, 0.22–0.34) and 66% (95% CI, 0.6–0.72), respectively. The pooled OR rates for the low-, standard-, and high-dose groups were 39.3%, 64%, and 60%, respectively, and those for the first-line and second-line groups were 58% and 54%, respectively. Conclusion: Treatment of IMN with RTX has comparable efficacy to other immunosuppressive treatments (ISTs). RTX has the advantages of no requirement for steroids and lower rates adverse event and relapse rates. Patients who relapse or are resistant to other IST agents also respond to RTX. RTX-based regimens and other B-cell-targeted therapies may represent the future of IMN therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.