Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34391193›Full record

ArticleHearing research2021

Responses to diotic tone-in-noise stimuli in the inferior colliculus: stimulus envelope and neural fluctuation cues.

Langchen Fan, Kenneth S Henry, Laurel H Carney

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Timbre Encoding in the Inferior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Mechanisms of Tone-in-Noise Encoding in the Inferior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward masking: Effects of age and hearing loss.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Langchen FanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, New York, United States. Electronic address: Laurel.Carney@Rochester.edu.
Kenneth S HenryDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, New York, United States; Department of Neuroscience, University of Rochester, New York, United States; Department of Otolaryngology, University of Rochester, New York, United States.
Laurel H CarneyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, New York, United States; Department of Neuroscience, University of Rochester, New York, United States.
University of Rochester · US

Funding

DEVELOPING AND TESTING MODELS OF THE AUDITORY SYSTEM WITH & WITHOUT HEARING LOSSR01DC010813 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CARNEY, LAUREL H. · 2011 to 2025
$5.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human detection thresholds in tone-in-noise (TIN) paradigms cannot be explained by the prevalent power-spectrum model when stimulus energy is made less reliable, e.g., in roving-level or equal-energy paradigms. Envelope-related cues provide an alternative that is more robust across level. The TIN stimulus envelope is encoded by slow fluctuations in auditory-nerve (AN) responses - a temporal representation affected by inner-hair-cell (IHC) saturation and cochlear compression. Here, envelope-related fluctuations in AN responses were hypothesized to be reflected in responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC), which have average discharge rates that are sensitive to amplitude-modulation (AM) depth and frequency. Responses to tones masked by narrowband gaussian noise (GN) and low-noise noise (LNN) were recorded in the IC of awake rabbits. Fluctuation amplitudes in the stimulus envelope and in model AN responses decrease for GN maskers and increase for LNN upon addition of tones near threshold. Response rates of IC neurons that are excited by AM were expected to be positively correlated with fluctuation amplitudes, whereas rates of neurons suppressed by AM were expected to be negatively correlated. Of neurons with measurable TIN-detection thresholds, most had the predicted changes in rate with increasing tone level for both GN and LNN maskers. Changes in rate with tone level were correlated with envelope sensitivity measured with two methods, including the maximum slopes of modulation transfer functions. IC rate-based thresholds were broadly consistent with published human and rabbit behavioral data. These results highlight the importance of midbrain sensitivity to envelope cues, as represented in peripheral neural fluctuations, for detection of signals in noise.

Indexed as

Inferior ColliculiNoiseAnimalsAuditory ThresholdCuesRabbitsAmplitude-modulation tuningLow-noise noiseMasked detection

Identifiers

PMID34391193
PMCPMC8419138
OpenAlexW3192786363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.