Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34390584›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2022

Hierarchical cancer heterogeneity analysis based on histopathological imaging features.

Mingyang Ren, Qingzhao Zhang, Sanguo Zhang, Tingyan Zhong, Jian Huang, Shuangge Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mingyang RenSchool of Mathematics Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Key Laboratory of Big Data Mining and Knowledge Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qingzhao ZhangMOE Key Laboratory of Economics, Department of Statistics, School of Economics, The Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics and Fujian Key Lab of Statistics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Sanguo ZhangSchool of Mathematics Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Key Laboratory of Big Data Mining and Knowledge Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tingyan ZhongSJTU-Yale Joint Center for Biostatistics, Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jian HuangDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Shuangge MaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9001-4999

Funding

Yale SPORE in Lung Cancer (YSILC): The Biology and Personalized Treatment of Lung CancerP50CA196530 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Kurt A Schalper · 2015 to 2026
$31.1M
Novel methods for identifying genetic interactions in cancer prognosisR01CA204120 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Shuangge Ma · 2016 to 2026
$3.5M
Integrated Cancer Modeling: A New DimensionR03CA241699 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MA, SHUANGGE · 2019 to 2020
$168k
Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project B13028National Natural Science Foundation of China 11971404National Natural Science Foundation of China 12026604National Natural Science Foundation of China 12171454National Natural Science Foundation of China 71988101National Science Foundation 1916251Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality Z190004NCI NIH HHS P50 CA196530NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204120NCI NIH HHS R03 CA241699Pazhou Lab 510320Yale Cancer Center Pilot Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cancer research, supervised heterogeneity analysis has important implications. Such analysis has been traditionally based on clinical/demographic/molecular variables. Recently, histopathological imaging features, which are generated as a byproduct of biopsy, have been shown as effective for modeling cancer outcomes, and a handful of supervised heterogeneity analysis has been conducted based on such features. There are two types of histopathological imaging features, which are extracted based on specific biological knowledge and using automated imaging processing software, respectively. Using both types of histopathological imaging features, our goal is to conduct the first supervised cancer heterogeneity analysis that satisfies a hierarchical structure. That is, the first type of imaging features defines a rough structure, and the second type defines a nested and more refined structure. A penalization approach is developed, which has been motivated by but differs significantly from penalized fusion and sparse group penalization. It has satisfactory statistical and numerical properties. In the analysis of lung adenocarcinoma data, it identifies a heterogeneity structure significantly different from the alternatives and has satisfactory prediction and stability performance.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsHumansSoftwarecancerhierarchyhistopathological imagingpenalizationsupervised heterogeneity analysis

Identifiers

PMID34390584
PMCPMC8995088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.