Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34390578›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2021

Evolution of the Insect PPK Gene Family.

Jose Manuel Latorre-Estivalis, Francisca C Almeida, Gina Pontes, Hernán Dopazo, Romina B Barrozo, Marcelo Gustavo Lorenzo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Multiple mechanisms of action of an extremely painful venom.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genomic architecture and functional unit of mimicry supergene in female limited Batesian mimicPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jose Manuel Latorre-EstivalisLaboratorio de Insectos Sociales, Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIByNE), Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Argentina.
Francisca C AlmeidaGrupo de Investigación en Filogeografía y Filogenias Moleculares, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gina PontesLaboratorio de Eco-Fisiología de Insectos del Instituto de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental y Aplicada (IBBEA-CONICET), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Hernán DopazoLaboratorio de Genómica de Poblaciones y Evolución, Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires (IEGEBA), CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Romina B BarrozoGrupo de Neuroetología de Insectos Vectores, Laboratorio de Fisiología de Insectos, Instituto de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental y Aplicada (IBBEA-UBA-CONICET), Departamento de Biología y Biodiversidad Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marcelo Gustavo LorenzoVector Behaviour and Pathogen Interaction Group, Instituto René Rachou-FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
University of Buenos Aires · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARExperimental Medicine and Biology Institute · ARFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRFundación Ciencias Exactas y Naturales · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect pickpocket (PPK) receptors mediate diverse functions, among them the detection of mechano- and chemo-sensory stimuli. Notwithstanding their relevance, studies on their evolution only focused on Drosophila. We have analyzed the genomes of 26 species of eight orders including holometabolous and hemimetabolous insects (Blattodea, Orthoptera, Hemiptera, Phthiraptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, and Diptera), to characterize the evolution of this gene family. PPKs were detected in all genomes analyzed, with 578 genes distributed in seven subfamilies. According to our phylogeny, ppk17 is the most divergent member, composing the new subfamily VII. PPKs evolved under a gene birth-and-death model that generated lineage-specific expansions usually located in clusters, while purifying selection affected several orthogroups. Subfamily V was the largest, including a mosquito-specific expansion that can be considered a new target for pest control. PPKs present a high gene turnover generating considerable variation. On one hand, Musca domestica (59), Aedes albopictus (51), Culex quinquefasciatus (48), and Blattella germanica (41) presented the largest PPK repertoires. On the other hand, Pediculus humanus (only ppk17), bees, and ants (6-9) had the smallest PPK sets. A subset of prevalent PPKs was identified, indicating very conserved functions for these receptors. Finally, at least 20% of the sequences presented calmodulin-binding motifs, suggesting that these PPKs may amplify sensory responses similarly as proposed for Drosophila melanogaster ppk25. Overall, this work characterized the evolutionary history of these receptors revealing relevant unknown gene sequence features and clade-specific expansions.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterEvolution, MolecularAnimalsBeesGenes, InsectInsectaPhylogenyDEG/ENaCsevolutioninsectsphylogenypickpocket receptors

Identifiers

PMID34390578
PMCPMC8438182
OpenAlexW3193862287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.