Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34390477›Full record

ReviewDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2021

The Challenge of Sustainable Access to Telemonitoring Tools for People with Diabetes in Europe: Lessons from COVID-19 and Beyond.

Pratik Choudhary, Virginia Bellido, Matthijs Graner, Bernd Altpeter, Americo Cicchetti, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Finn Børlum Kristensen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Tubeless Insulin Pump Combined with a Cloud-Based Data Management Platform: Real-World Evidence from 14,765 French People with Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pratik ChoudharyLeicester Diabetes Centre (Bloom), Leicester General Hospital, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. pratik.choudhary@leicester.ac.uk.
Virginia BellidoDepartment of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Matthijs GranerThe Ééndiabetes Foundation, Bussum, The Netherlands.
Bernd AltpeterDigital Health Groupe and German Institute of Telemedicine, Frankfurt, Germany.
Americo CicchettiSchool of Healthcare Systems, Economics and Management, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Isabelle Durand-ZaleskiSanté publique-AP-HP Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor (Créteil), Créteil, France.
Finn Børlum KristensenDanish Centre for Health Economics (DaCHE), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telemedicine in diabetes care has been evolving over several years, particularly since the advent of cloud-connected technologies for diabetes management, such as glucose monitoring devices, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, that facilitate sharing of glucose data between people with diabetes and their healthcare professionals in near-real time. Extreme social distancing and shielding in place for vulnerable patients during the COVID-19 pandemic has created both the challenge and the opportunity to provide care at a distance on a large scale. Available evidence suggests that glucose control has in fact improved during this period for people with diabetes who are able to use CGM devices for remote glucose monitoring. The development of telemedicine as part of the standard of care in diabetes faces significant challenges in the European context, particularly in terms of providing consistent and effective care at a distance to large populations of patients while using robust systems that can be supported by large regional and national healthcare services. These challenges include a fragmented approach to healthcare technology assessment and reimbursement, lack of eHealth education and literacy, particularly amongst healthcare professionals, lack of data integration, as well as concerns about electronic health records, patient consent and privacy. Here we review the benefits of and challenges to wider application of telemedicine and telemonitoring in the post-pandemic future, with the aim to ensure that the value of these eHealth services is provided to patients, healthcare providers and health systems.

Indexed as

Continuous glucose monitoringCOVID-19eHealthTelemedicineTelemonitoringType 1 diabetesType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID34390477
PMCPMC8363869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.