Trial reportAIDS and behavior2022
Inconsistent Counselor Fidelity in Delivering an Evidence-Based Adherence Intervention During a PrEP Trial.
Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence-based adherence counseling interventions must be delivered with fidelity to ensure that their effectiveness is retained, but little is known regarding how counselors in biomedical HIV trials deliver these interventions. Forty-two counselors from the MTN-025/HOPE Study, which was conducted in 14 sites in sub-Saharan Africa, participated. They completed a quantitative assessment and consented for their HOPE counseling session ratings to be analyzed. Twenty-two (52%) self-identified as research nurses and 20 (48%) as counselors. Of 928 session ratings, 609 (66%) were classified as Good, 188 (20%) as Fair, and 131 (14%) as Poor, based on pre-established criteria. Overall mean ratings for session tasks and global components (each rated from 1 to 5) were 4.12 (SD = 0.45; range 2.46-4.73) and 4.02 (SD = 0.64; range 1.75-4.79), respectively. Twenty-six (62%) counselors attained Good or Fair ratings on at least 85% of their sessions, but 33% of counselors had more than 25% of their sessions rated as Poor; three counselors (7%) never met criteria for a Good session. Even after extensive training, counselors' fidelity to the intervention varied. Our findings highlight the value of fidelity monitoring using session audio-recordings, the importance of ongoing coaching and support, and the need to plan for counselors with consistently poor fidelity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.