Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34390402›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2021

Vagal blockade suppresses the phase I heart rate response but not the phase I cardiac output response at exercise onset in humans.

Timothée Fontolliet, Aurélien Bringard, Alessandra Adami, Nazzareno Fagoni, Enrico Tam, Anna Taboni, Guido Ferretti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Timothée Fontolliet *Department of Basic Neurosciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. timothee.fontolliet@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4140-4234
Aurélien Bringard *Pulmunology Service, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Alessandra AdamiDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1917-9296
Nazzareno FagoniDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Enrico TamDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Anna TaboniDepartment of Basic Neurosciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Guido FerrettiDepartment of Basic Neurosciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 32003B_127620Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 3200B0-114033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe tested the vagal withdrawal concept for heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO) kinetics upon moderate exercise onset, by analysing the effects of vagal blockade on cardiovascular kinetics in humans. We hypothesized that, under atropine, the φ

methodsOn nine young non-smoking men, during 0-80 W exercise transients of 5-min duration on the cycle ergometer, preceded by 5-min rest, we continuously recorded HR, CO, SV and oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O

resultsIn atropine versus control, A

conclusionThe results are fully compatible with the tested hypothesis. They provide the first direct demonstration that vagal blockade, while suppressing HR φ

Indexed as

Cardiac OutputExerciseHeart RateHumansMaleNerve BlockOxygen ConsumptionVagus NerveYoung AdultatropineCardiac outputExercise transientsHeart rateStroke volume

Identifiers

PMID34390402
PMCPMC8505324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.