ArticleESC heart failure2021
Machine learning-based model for predicting 1 year mortality of hospitalized patients with heart failure.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of machine learning algorithms for mortality risk, readmission and phenotype prediction in patients with heart failure: exploring key data sources, input variables and outcomes.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of machine learning methods for prediction of heart failure mortality and readmission: meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical Impact of Hospital-Associated Disability in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Predicting survival in patients with heart failure aged 80 years and older.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- A Dynamic Prognosis Model of Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Prospective Cohort Study Using Follow-Up Data and Recurrent Neural Networks.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Observational
- The Narrative Review: Advancements in Heart Failure Diagnosis and Management using Artificial Intelligence: A New Era of Patient Care.Current cardiology reviews · 2026Review
- Article
- Deep learning for predicting rehospitalization in acute heart failure: Model foundation and external validation.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Machine learning for predicting in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with heart failure combined with hypertension: a multicenter retrospective study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Article
- Deep learning prediction of survival in patients with heart failure using chest radiographs.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Machine learning in heart failure diagnosis, prediction, and prognosis: review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Evaluation of the AJournal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- The impact of cardiac rehabilitation for older adults with heart failure who underwent invasive cardiac treatment eligible for long-term care needs certification: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of general and family medicine · 2024Article
- Interpretable prediction of 3-year all-cause mortality in patients with chronic heart failure based on machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Digital Transformation in the Diagnostics and Therapy of Cardiovascular Diseases: Comprehensive Literature Review.JMIR cardio · 2023Review
- Clinical application of artificial intelligence algorithm for prediction of one-year mortality in heart failure patients.Heart and vessels · 2023Article
- Machine learning-based in-hospital mortality risk prediction tool for intensive care unit patients with heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Outcomes and predictors of one-year mortality in patients hospitalized with Acute Heart Failure.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Article
- The Acute-Phase Ambulation Program Improves Clinical Outcome for Acute Heart Failure.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Article
- Interpretable machine learning for 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality prediction in critically ill patients with heart failure combined with hypertension: A retrospective cohort study based on medical information mart for intensive care database-IV and eICU databases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsIndividual risk stratification is a fundamental strategy in managing patients with heart failure (HF). Artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning (ML), can develop superior models for predicting the prognosis of HF patients, and administrative claim data (ACD) are suitable for ML analysis because ACD is a structured database. The objective of this study was to analyse ACD using an ML algorithm, predict the 1 year mortality of patients with HF, and finally develop an easy-to-use prediction model with high accuracy using the top predictors identified by the ML algorithm. METHODS AND
resultsMachine learning-based prognostic prediction models were developed from the ACD on 10 175 HF patients from the Japanese Registry of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with 17% mortality during 1 year follow-up. The top predictors for prognosis in HF were identified by the permutation feature importance technique, and an easy-to-use prediction model was developed based on these predictors. The c-statistics and Brier scores of the developed ML-based models were compared with those of conventional risk models: Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) and Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC). A voting classifier algorithm (ACD-VC) achieved the highest c-statistics among the six ML algorithms. The permutation feature importance technique enabled identification of the top predictors such as Barthel index, age, body mass index, duration of hospitalization, last hospitalization, renal disease, and non-loop diuretics use (feature importance values were 0.054, 0.025, 0.010, 0.005, 0.005, 0.004, and 0.004, respectively). Upon combination of some of the predictors that can be assessed from a brief interview, the Simple Model by ARTificial intelligence for HF risk stratification (SMART-HF) was established as an easy-to-use prediction model. Compared with the conventional models, SMART-HF achieved a higher c-statistic {ACD-VC: 0.777 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.751-0.803], SMART-HF: 0.765 [95% CI 0.739-0.791], SHFM: 0.713 [95% CI 0.684-0.742], MAGGIC: 0.726 [95% CI 0.698-0.753]} and better Brier scores (ACD-VC: 0.121, SMART-HF: 0.124, SHFM: 0.139, MAGGIC: 0.130).
conclusionsThe ML model based on ACD predicted the 1 year mortality of HF patients with high accuracy, and SMART-HF along with the ML model achieved superior performance to that of the conventional risk models. The SMART-HF model has the clear merit of easy operability even by non-healthcare providers with a user-friendly online interface (https://hfriskcalculator.herokuapp.com/). Risk models developed using SMART-HF may provide a novel modality for risk stratification of patients with HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.