Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34390219›Full record

ReviewESC heart failure2021

Patient monitoring across the spectrum of heart failure disease management 10 years after the CHAMPION trial.

William T Abraham, Daniel Bensimhon, Sean P Pinney, Scott C Feitell, W Frank Peacock, Offer Amir, Daniel Burkhoff

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05405504 (Evaluation of ReDS Pro System V2.7 and ReDS ICU in Patients With Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05405504 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of ReDS Pro System V2.7 and ReDS ICU in Patients With Heart Failure

TypeobservationalSponsorChristian HassagerRan2022 to 2024Enrolled25ConditionsHeart FailureArmsRemote Dielectric Sensing (ReDS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Heart Failure: Is There an Ideal Biomarker?Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. New Strategies to Prevent Rehospitalizations for Heart Failure.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

William T AbrahamDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Daniel BensimhonCardiovascular Medicine, Cone Health, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Sean P PinneyDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Scott C FeitellCardiovascular Medicine, Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, NY, USA.
W Frank PeacockDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Offer AmirDepartment of Cardiology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Daniel BurkhoffCardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine · USCardiovascular Research Foundation · USCone Health · USHadassah Medical Center · ILThe Ohio State University · USUnity Health System · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant advances in drug-based and device-based therapies, heart failure remains a major and growing public health problem associated with substantial disability, frequent hospitalizations, and high economic costs. Keeping patients well and out of the hospital has become a major focus of heart failure disease management. Achieving and maintaining such stability in heart failure patients requires a holistic approach, which includes at least the management of the underlying heart disease, the management of comorbidities and the social and psychological aspects of the disease, and the management of haemodynamic/fluid status. In this regard, accurate assessment of elevated ventricular filling pressures or volume overload, that is, haemodynamic or pulmonary congestion, respectively, before the onset of worsening heart failure symptoms represents an important management strategy. Unfortunately, conventional methods for assessing congestion, such as physical examination and monitoring of symptoms and daily weights, are insensitive markers of worsening heart failure. Assessment tools that directly measure congestion, accurately and in absolute terms, provide more actionable information that enables the application of treatment algorithms designed to restore patient stability, in a variety of clinical settings. Two such assessment tools, implantable haemodynamic monitors and remote dielectric sensing (ReDS), meet the prerequisites for useful heart failure management tools, by providing accurate, absolute, and actionable measures of congestion, to guide patient management. This review focuses on the use of such technologies, across the spectrum of heart failure treatment settings. Clinical data are presented that support the broad use of pulmonary artery pressure-guided and/or ReDS-guided heart failure management in heart failure patients with reduced and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Indexed as

Heart FailureVentricular Function, LeftDisease ManagementHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicStroke VolumeHeart failure managementLung fluidPulmonary pressureRemote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID34390219
PMCPMC8497370
OpenAlexW3188665393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.