Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34390186›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2021

Comparative analysis of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells.

Sheeja Rajasingh, Vinoth Sigamani, Vijay Selvam, Narasimman Gurusamy, Shivaani Kirankumar, Jayavardini Vasanthan, Johnson Rajasingh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. The hope, hype and obstacles surrounding cell therapy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheeja RajasinghDepartment of Bioscience Research, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Vinoth SigamaniDepartment of Bioscience Research, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Vijay SelvamDepartment of Genetic Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India.
Narasimman GurusamyDepartment of Bioscience Research, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Shivaani KirankumarDepartment of Genetic Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India.
Jayavardini VasanthanDepartment of Genetic Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India.
Johnson RajasinghDepartment of Bioscience Research, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6172-4083
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · USSRM Institute of Science and Technology · IN

Funding

scaRNA Modified Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes or Exosomes Therapy for Chronic Ischemic Cardiomyopathy PatientsR01HL141345 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI JOHNSON, RAJASINGH · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 20TPA35490215NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141345NIH HHS HL141345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and their differentiation into mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (iMSCs) have created exciting source of cells for autologous therapy. In this study, we have compared the therapeutic potential of iMSCs generated from urinary epithelial (UE) cells with the available umbilical cord MSCs (UC-MSCs). For this, adult UE cells were treated with the mRNA of pluripotent genes (OCT4, NANOG, SOX2, KLF4, MYC and LIN28) and a cocktail of miRNAs under specific culture conditions for generating iPSCs. Our non-viral and mRNA-based treatment regimen demonstrated a high reprogramming efficiency to about 30% at passage 0. These UE-iPSCs were successfully differentiated further into ectoderm, endoderm and mesoderm lineage of cells. Moreover, these UE-iPSCs were subsequently differentiated into iMSCs and were compared with the UC-MSCs. These iMSCs were capable of differentiating into osteocytes, chondrocytes and adipocytes. Our qRT-PCR and Western blot data showed that the CD73, CD90 and CD105 gene transcripts and proteins were highly expressed in iMSCs and UC-MSCs but not in other cells. The comparative qRT-PCR data showed that the iMSCs maintained their MSC characteristics without any chromosomal abnormalities even at later passages (P15), during which the UC-MSCs started losing their MSC characteristics. Importantly, the wound-healing property demonstrated through migration assay was superior in iMSCs when compared to the UC-MSCs. In this study, we have demonstrated an excellent non-invasive and pain-free method of obtaining iMSCs for regenerative therapy. These homogeneous autologous highly proliferative iMSCs may provide an alternative source of cells to UC-MSCs for treating various diseases.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCells, CulturedHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMiddle AgedRegenerative MedicineUmbilical Cord

Identifiers

PMID34390186
PMCPMC8435459
OpenAlexW3189828545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.