Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34390089›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2021

Accounting for symptom heterogeneity can improve neuroimaging models of antidepressant response after electroconvulsive therapy.

Benjamin S C Wade, Gerhard Hellemann, Randall T Espinoza, Roger P Woods, Shantanu H Joshi, Ronny Redlich, Udo Dannlowski, Anders Jorgensen, Christopher C Abbott, Leif Oltedal and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in Major Depression: Oldies but Goodies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Investigation of Neurofunctional Changes Over the Course of Electroconvulsive Therapy.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Benjamin S C WadeAhmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center, Department of Neurology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2461-6101
Gerhard HellemannDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Randall T EspinozaDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Roger P WoodsAhmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center, Department of Neurology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9679-9571
Shantanu H JoshiAhmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center, Department of Neurology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ronny RedlichInstitute of Translational Psychiatry, Department of Mental Health, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7018-4525
Udo DannlowskiInstitute of Translational Psychiatry, Department of Mental Health, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Anders JorgensenPsychiatric Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christopher C AbbottDepartment of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Leif OltedalDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Katherine L NarrAhmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center, Department of Neurology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Brain Mapping Foundation · USNeurobehavioral Systems · USUniversity of Münster · DEHaukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Perturbation of the treatment resistant depression connectome by fast-acting therapiesU01MH110008 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ESPINOZA, RANDALL, NARR, KATHERINE L · 2016 to 2019
$5.5M
Imaging biomarkers of ECT response in major depressive disorderR01MH092301 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ESPINOZA, RANDALL, NARR, KATHERINE L · 2011 to 2015
$4.0M
ECT current amplitude and medial temporal lobe engagementU01MH111826 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI ABBOTT, CHRISTOPHER C · 2017 to 2019
$1.5M
Biomarkers of fast acting therapies in major depressionK24MH102743 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI NARR, KATHERINE L · 2014 to 2018
$889k
ECT current amplitude and medial temporal lobe engagementR01MH111826 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI ABBOTT, CHRISTOPHER C · 2016 to 2016
$522k
Data-driven models of symptom heterogeneity to empower transdiagnostic multimodal biomarker discovery in mood disordersK99MH119314 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WADE, BENJAMIN SEAVEY CUTLER · 2019 to 2020
$208k
NIH HHS 2P20GM103472NIMH NIH HHS MH092301NIMH NIH HHS MH102743NIMH NIH HHS MH110008NIMH NIH HHS MH111826NIMH NIH HHS MH119314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression symptom heterogeneity limits the identifiability of treatment-response biomarkers. Whether improvement along dimensions of depressive symptoms relates to separable neural networks remains poorly understood. We build on work describing three latent symptom dimensions within the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and use data-driven methods to relate multivariate patterns of patient clinical, demographic, and brain structural changes over electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to dimensional changes in depressive symptoms. We included 110 ECT patients from Global ECT-MRI Research Collaboration (GEMRIC) sites who underwent structural MRI and HDRS assessments before and after treatment. Cross validated random forest regression models predicted change along symptom dimensions. HDRS symptoms clustered into dimensions of somatic disturbances (SoD), core mood and anhedonia (CMA), and insomnia. The coefficient of determination between predicted and actual changes were 22%, 39%, and 39% (all p < .01) for SoD, CMA, and insomnia, respectively. CMA and insomnia change were predicted more accurately than HDRS-6 and HDRS-17 changes (p < .05). Pretreatment symptoms, body-mass index, and age were important predictors. Important imaging predictors included the right transverse temporal gyrus and left frontal pole for the SoD dimension; right transverse temporal gyrus and right rostral middle frontal gyrus for the CMA dimension; and right superior parietal lobule and left accumbens for the insomnia dimension. Our findings support that recovery along depressive symptom dimensions is predicted more accurately than HDRS total scores and are related to unique and overlapping patterns of clinical and demographic data and volumetric changes in brain regions related to depression and near ECT electrodes.

Indexed as

Electroconvulsive TherapyMachine LearningAdultAgedCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingOutcome Assessment, Health Careelectroconvulsive therapymachine learningmajor depressive disorderstructural neuroimagingsymptom heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID34390089
PMCPMC8519875
OpenAlexW3189068023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.