Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34390014›Full record

SynthesisAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2021

Systematic review: radiomics for the diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Emily Harding-Theobald, Jeremy Louissaint, Bharat Maraj, Edward Cuaresma, Whitney Townsend, Mishal Mendiratta-Lala, Amit G Singal, Grace L Su, Anna S Lok, Neehar D Parikh

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Assessment of liver fibrosis and tumor burden in hepatocellular carcinoma using [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emily Harding-TheobaldDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jeremy LouissaintDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1154-1825
Bharat MarajDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Edward CuaresmaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Whitney TownsendDivision of Library Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Mishal Mendiratta-LalaDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Amit G SingalDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1172-3971
Grace L SuDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Anna S LokDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Neehar D ParikhDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5874-9933

Funding

Training Program in Gastrointestinal EpidemiologyT32DK062708 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Peter D.R. Higgins, Elliot Tapper · 2003 to 2026
$3.9M
Precision Risk Stratification and Screening for HCC among Patients with Cirrhosis in the United StatesU01CA230694 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SINGAL, AMIT · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
NOVEL STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE LIVER CANCER SURVEILLANCE UPTAKE AND EARLY DETECTIONU01CA230669 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LOK, ANNA S.F., SU, GRACE L. · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA230669NCI NIH HHS U01 CA230694NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK062708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in imaging technology have the potential to transform the early diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through quantitative image analysis. Computational "radiomic" techniques extract biomarker information from images which can be used to improve diagnosis and predict tumour biology.

aimsTo perform a systematic review on radiomic features in HCC diagnosis and prognosis, with a focus on reporting metrics and methodologic standardisation.

methodsWe performed a systematic review of all full-text articles published from inception through December 1, 2019. Standardised data extraction and quality assessment metrics were applied to all studies.

resultsA total of 54 studies were included for analysis. Radiomic features demonstrated good discriminatory performance to differentiate HCC from other solid lesions (c-statistics 0.66-0.95), and to predict microvascular invasion (c-statistic 0.76-0.92), early recurrence after hepatectomy (c-statistics 0.71-0.86), and prognosis after locoregional or systemic therapies (c-statistics 0.74-0.81). Common stratifying features for diagnostic and prognostic radiomic tools included analyses of imaging skewness, analysis of the peritumoural region, and feature extraction from the arterial imaging phase. The overall quality of the included studies was low, with common deficiencies in both internal and external validation, standardised imaging segmentation, and lack of comparison to a gold standard.

conclusionsQuantitative image analysis demonstrates promise as a non-invasive biomarker to improve HCC diagnosis and management. However, standardisation of protocols and outcome measurement, sharing of algorithms and analytic methods, and external validation are necessary prior to widespread application of radiomics to HCC diagnosis and prognosis in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsHepatectomyHumansPrognosisRetrospective Studiesbiomarkerearly detectionHCCMRIprognosisradiogenomics

Identifiers

PMID34390014
PMCPMC8435007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.