ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
Does diversified environmental regulation make FDI cleaner and more beneficial to China's green growth?
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Green merger and acquisition decision driven by environmental regulation and its impact on green innovation: evidence from Chinese heavily polluting listed enterprises.Environment, development and sustainability · 2023Article
- Revival of sun-and-beach tourism through the lens of regulatory and risk dimensions of environmental sustainability.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Will China's R&D investment improve green innovation performance? An empirical study.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Does FDI improve green total factor energy efficiency under heterogeneous environmental regulation? Evidence from China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the internationalization and financial development, it is urgent to explore the effect of foreign direct investment on green economy under the context of multiple environmental regulations. By using the provincial panel data in the period of 2000-2016, the paper adopts the System Generalized Method of Moments and threshold models to detect the moderating effect of diversified environmental regulation on the nexus between foreign direct investment and green growth in China. The empirical results reveal that foreign direct investment has direct positive spillovers on China's green growth and supports the "pollution halo" hypothesis. There is a threshold effect of command-and-control regulation that exists in foreign direct investment's spillovers to green growth. Stricter command-and-control regulation can stimulate foreign direct investment's spillovers on green growth in China; however, market-based and informal regulations fail to. Some suggestions are proposed for constructing a matched and compatible policy system of foreign direct investment, environment protection, and economic growth by adjusting the intensity, tools, and enforcement of corresponding policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34389943What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.