ArticleNature2021
Autocorrect errors in Excel still creating genomics headache.
Article in Nature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing Reproducible Fisheries Research: A Decade of Experience With the Kahawai Reporting System.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2026Article
- Protein-coding genes in humans and model mammals (mouse, rat and pig): gene identifiers and disambiguation of gene nomenclature retrieved from the Ensembl genome browser.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Data standards for single-cell RNA-sequencing of paediatric cancer.Clinical & translational immunology · 2025Review
- The Venus score for the assessment of the quality and trustworthiness of biomedical datasets.BioData mining · 2025Article
- Eleven quick tips for properly handling tabular data.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for the sharing of bacterial genotype-Phenotype data on antimicrobial resistance.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Data storage architectures to accelerate chemical discovery: data accessibility for individual laboratories and the community.Chemical science · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34389840What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.