Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34389818›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2022

Imaging endpoints for clinical trials in MacTel type 2.

Daniel Pauleikhoff, Laurenz Pauleikhoff, Emily Y Chew

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Macular telangiectasia type 2: An update.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Letter to the Editor: Investigation of factors that may affect the foveal avascular zone: An optical coherence tomography angiography study.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Macular Telangiectasia Type 2: A Comprehensive Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel PauleikhoffDepartment of Ophthalmology, St. Franziskus Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany. dapauleikhoff@muenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3691-291X
Laurenz PauleikhoffUniversity Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Emily Y ChewNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0999-9802

Funding

Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor (CNTF) for Macular Telangiectasia Type 2 (MacTel) (14-EI-0078, 17-EI-0136)ZIAEY000536 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI CHEW, EMILY Y · 2014 to 2025
$635k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMacular Telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel) is a bilateral neurodegenerative disease associated with dysfunction in the serine and lipid metabolism resulting in loss of Muller cells and photoreceptors. Typical structural changes include vascular abnormalities, loss of retinal transparency, redistribution of macular pigment and thinning of the central retina with photoreceptor loss. The presence and extent of photoreceptor loss, as visible on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) ("disease severity scale"), correlate with functional loss and the limitation of photoreceptor loss appears to be the most promising therapeutic approach. Ongoing clinical trials of ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) implants for the treatment of MacTel are using this outcome to evaluate efficacy. An ideal outcome measure provides the ability to quantify the extent of the disease progression with precision and reproducibility.

methodsThis review describes the changes and findings on different imaging techniques including fluorescein- and OCT angiography, blue light reflectance, 1- and 2-wavelength autofluorescence and OCT.

resultsThe possibilities of objective quantification of the severity of MacTel and correlation with functional characteristics such as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and microperimetry and their applications as quantitative imaging endpoints for clinical treatment trials are discussed. OCT and especially en face OCT could be demonstrated as precise and reproducible methods to quantify the area of photoreceptor loss, which correlated highly significantly with functional loss in microperimetry.

conclusionThe analysis of the area of photoreceptor loss on en face OCT is the most reliable imaging endpoint for treatment trials in MacTel. This method is already being used in ongoing randomized trials.

Indexed as

Neurodegenerative DiseasesRetinal TelangiectasisClinical Trials as TopicFluorescein AngiographyHumansReproducibility of ResultsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID34389818
PMCPMC8807726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.