Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34389815›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2021

Tumour-host interactions through the lens of Drosophila.

David Bilder, Katy Ong, Tsai-Ching Hsi, Kavya Adiga, Jung Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Macrophage restriction inScience advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tumor-Associated Macrophages Promote Brain Metastasis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David BilderDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. bilder@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-4966
Katy OngDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6237-3580
Tsai-Ching HsiDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-3133
Kavya AdigaDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9511-892X
Jung KimDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-2844

Funding

Polarity, growth, and morphogenesis of epitheliaR35GM130388 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI David Bilder · 2019 to 2026
$6.5M
Mechanisms of Drosophila Tumor SuppressionR01GM090150 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BILDER, DAVID · 2010 to 2018
$2.0M
PQ6 MECHANISMS OF CACHEXIA LIKE WASTING IN A DROSPHILA CANCER MODELR21CA180107 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BILDER, DAVID · 2013 to 2014
$281k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA180107NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM090150NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a large gap between the deep understanding of mechanisms driving tumour growth and the reasons why patients ultimately die of cancer. It is now appreciated that interactions between the tumour and surrounding non-tumour (sometimes referred to as host) cells play critical roles in mortality as well as tumour progression, but much remains unknown about the underlying molecular mechanisms, especially those that act beyond the tumour microenvironment. Drosophila has a track record of high-impact discoveries about cell-autonomous growth regulation, and is well suited to now probe mysteries of tumour - host interactions. Here, we review current knowledge about how fly tumours interact with microenvironmental stroma, circulating innate immune cells and distant organs to influence disease progression. We also discuss reciprocal regulation between tumours and host physiology, with a particular focus on paraneoplasias. The fly's simplicity along with the ability to study lethality directly provide an opportunity to shed new light on how cancer actually kills.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionDrosophila melanogasterTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsHumansImmunity, InnateNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID34389815
PMCPMC8669834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.