Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34389808›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2022

Computational models of adaptive behavior and prefrontal cortex.

Alireza Soltani, Etienne Koechlin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanisms Underlying Pain Avoidance in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026
    Observational
  2. Orbitofrontal noradrenaline supports adaptive learning-rate adjustment in probabilistic reversal learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. The Amygdala and Politics.Brain sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Reduced Pavlovian Value Updating Alters Decision-Making in Sign-Trackers.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alireza SoltaniDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. soltani@dartmouth.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4386-8486
Etienne KoechlinInstitut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Ecole Normale Superieure, Paris, France. etienne.koechlin@upmc.fr.

Funding

CRCNS Research Proposal: Cortico-amygdalar substrates of adaptive learningR01DA047870 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Alicia Izquierdo, Alireza Soltani · 2018 to 2026
$4.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The real world is uncertain, and while ever changing, it constantly presents itself in terms of new sets of behavioral options. To attain the flexibility required to tackle these challenges successfully, most mammalian brains are equipped with certain computational abilities that rely on the prefrontal cortex (PFC). By examining learning in terms of internal models associating stimuli, actions, and outcomes, we argue here that adaptive behavior relies on specific interactions between multiple systems including: (1) selective models learning stimulus-action associations through rewards; (2) predictive models learning stimulus- and/or action-outcome associations through statistical inferences anticipating behavioral outcomes; and (3) contextual models learning external cues associated with latent states of the environment. Critically, the PFC combines these internal models by forming task sets to drive behavior and, moreover, constantly evaluates the reliability of actor task sets in predicting external contingencies to switch between task sets or create new ones. We review different models of adaptive behavior to demonstrate how their components map onto this unifying framework and specific PFC regions. Finally, we discuss how our framework may help to better understand the neural computations and the cognitive architecture of PFC regions guiding adaptive behavior.

Indexed as

LearningPrefrontal CortexAdaptation, PsychologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID34389808
PMCPMC8617006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.