ArticleScientific reports2021
Patient-specific computational simulation of coronary artery bifurcation stenting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging Comparisons Between Bifurcation Stenting Procedures Performed in Human Patients and Those Within Reanimated Swine Hearts.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Prediction of Post-stenting Lumen Dimensions Using High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Rapid coronary artery stent computational simulation using the simplex deformable model.Medical engineering & physics · 2026Article
- Postdilation Strategies Following Provisional Stenting of Left Main Coronary Bifurcations: Insights From Patient-Specific Computational Simulations.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Patient-Specific 3D Coronary Reconstruction and Computational Simulations to Guide Drug-Coated Balloon Intervention: First-in-Human Experience.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- From association to causation: Integrating stable, subgroup-aware SHAP explanations with causal inference for trustworthy AI in coronary bifurcation PCI.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2026Article
- Comparison of Different Double-Stent Implantation Techniques on Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Finite Element Analysis.Current cardiology reviews · 2026Article
- Side branch ballooning in provisional stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions: the case for a selective, imaging- and physiology-guided approach.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Computational simulations of coronary artery bifurcation stenting using realistic plaque distribution and materials.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predictive computational framework to provide a digital twin for personalized cardiovascular medicine.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Advancements in Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Techniques: Insights From Computational and Bench Testing Studies.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Artery Interventions: Preprocedural Planning and Procedural Assistance.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Review
- Computational modeling of drug-eluting balloons in peripheral artery disease: Mechanisms, optimization, and translational insights.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Development of colonic stent simulator using three-dimensional printing technique: a simulator development study in Korea.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Article
- Numerical modeling and analysis of cardiac stent using blood hammer principle.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024Article
- Structural and temporal dynamics analysis on drug-eluting stents: History, research hotspots and emerging trends.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Post-procedure micro-CT analyses of coronary artery stenting in left main vessels of reanimated and perfusion-fixed human hearts.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Article
- Uncertainty Quantification in the In Vivo Image-Based Estimation of Local Elastic Properties of Vascular Walls.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- Computational fluid dynamics as supporting technology for coronary artery disease diagnosis and treatment: an international survey.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 15 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-specific and lesion-specific computational simulation of bifurcation stenting is an attractive approach to achieve individualized pre-procedural planning that could improve outcomes. The objectives of this work were to describe and validate a novel platform for fully computational patient-specific coronary bifurcation stenting. Our computational stent simulation platform was trained using n = 4 patient-specific bench bifurcation models (n = 17 simulations), and n = 5 clinical bifurcation cases (training group, n = 23 simulations). The platform was blindly tested in n = 5 clinical bifurcation cases (testing group, n = 29 simulations). A variety of stent platforms and stent techniques with 1- or 2-stents was used. Post-stenting imaging with micro-computed tomography (μCT) for bench group and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for clinical groups were used as reference for the training and testing of computational coronary bifurcation stenting. There was a very high agreement for mean lumen diameter (MLD) between stent simulations and post-stenting μCT in bench cases yielding an overall bias of 0.03 (- 0.28 to 0.34) mm. Similarly, there was a high agreement for MLD between stent simulation and OCT in clinical training group [bias 0.08 (- 0.24 to 0.41) mm], and clinical testing group [bias 0.08 (- 0.29 to 0.46) mm]. Quantitatively and qualitatively stent size and shape in computational stenting was in high agreement with clinical cases, yielding an overall bias of < 0.15 mm. Patient-specific computational stenting of coronary bifurcations is a feasible and accurate approach. Future clinical studies are warranted to investigate the ability of computational stenting simulations to guide decision-making in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.