Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34389617›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer.

Leisha A Emens, Sylvia Adams, Ashley Cimino-Mathews, Mary L Disis, Margaret E Gatti-Mays, Alice Y Ho, Kevin Kalinsky, Heather L McArthur, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Rita Nanda and 7 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 56 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and endocrinopathies in pediatric brain tumor patients.Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 16 institutions in 3 countries.

Leisha A EmensDepartment of Medicine, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA jlitton@mdanderson.org emensla@upmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7694-0731
Sylvia AdamsPerlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone, New York, New York, USA.
Ashley Cimino-MathewsDepartment of Pathology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0638-7969
Mary L DisisCancer Vaccine Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Margaret E Gatti-MaysPelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8914-2897
Alice Y HoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kevin KalinskyWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Heather L McArthurDepartment of Medicine, UT Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Elizabeth A MittendorfDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rita NandaDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
David B PageEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9264-4628
Hope S RugoHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6710-4814
Krista M RubinCenter for Melanoma, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hatem SolimanDepartment of Breast Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Patricia A SpearsUniversity of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Sara M TolaneyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5940-8671
Jennifer K LittonDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA jlitton@mdanderson.org emensla@upmc.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USEmory University · USJohns Hopkins University · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USNYU Langone Health · USProvidence Portland Medical Center · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USThe Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer has historically been a disease for which immunotherapy was largely unavailable. Recently, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has demonstrated efficacy, including longer progression-free survival and increased overall survival in subsets of patients. Based on clinical benefit in randomized trials, ICIs in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of some patients with advanced/metastatic TNBC have been approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA), expanding options for patients. Ongoing questions remain, however, about the optimal chemotherapy backbone for immunotherapy, appropriate biomarker-based selection of patients for treatment, the optimal strategy for immunotherapy treatment in earlier stage disease, and potential use in histological subtypes other than TNBC. To provide guidance to the oncology community on these and other important concerns, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG). The expert panel drew upon the published literature as well as their clinical experience to develop recommendations for healthcare professionals on these important aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment for breast cancer, including diagnostic testing, treatment planning, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and patient quality of life (QOL) considerations. The evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations in this CPG are intended to give guidance to cancer care providers treating patients with breast cancer.

Indexed as

FemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansImmunotherapySocieties, MedicalTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administrationbreast neoplasmsclinical trials as topicguidelines as topicimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID34389617
PMCPMC8365813
OpenAlexW3191707867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.