Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34389578›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Municipal acute care teams as a flexible solution for the treatment of acutely ill patients at-home: a mixed-method study of patients' and caregivers' experiences with an acute care team.

Stine Emilie Junker Udesen, Dorthe Susanne Nielsen, Nina Andersen, Christina Østervang, Annmarie Touborg Lassen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hybrid Hospital-at-Home Program in Singapore: Ethnographic Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stine Emilie Junker UdesenThe Department of the Elderly and Disabled, Odense Municipality, Odense, Denmark stine.emilie.junker.udesen@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-5962-514X
Dorthe Susanne NielsenDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Migrant Health Clinic, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Nina AndersenThe Department of the Elderly and Disabled, Odense Municipality, Odense, Denmark.
Christina ØstervangClinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5990-0167
Annmarie Touborg LassenClinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4942-6152

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDevelopment of initiatives to reduce hospitalisations is a major focus of healthcare planning. Strengthening the community with municipal acute care teams or units is a newly implemented Danish initiative aimed at preventing hospitalisations and supporting more flexible services. This study aims to describe patients treated by a municipal acute care team and to explore patients' and caregivers' experiences with at-home treatment.

designA mixed-method study consisting of descriptive statistics of patients treated by an acute care team, and quantitative and qualitative data from follow-up telephone questionnaires with patients and caregivers.

settingThe acute care team, 'Acute Team Odense' (ATO), in the Odense Municipality, Denmark.

participantsPatients treated by ATO and their caregivers. ATO treated 3231 patients (5676 contacts) in the period of 2018-2019.

resultsAverage number of new contacts per day was 7.8, and the median treatment-length was 1 day. Patients were referred by various healthcare providers and most often by general practitioners, municipal staff and hospital staff. The median age of the patients was 80 years, and 20% were independent before the treatment. In total, 787/5676 contacts received at-home intravenous therapy, which corresponded to 3.6 hospital beds saved per day. The questionnaires were completed by 307/478 patients and 168/254 caregivers. Most respondents stated they would prefer at-home treatment in future similar situations as it enabled them to maintain their lives. Several respondents also experienced that ATO avoided hospitalisations or reduced hospital stays, which was described as a relief.

conclusionATO was frequently used, indicating the demand for community-based acute healthcare. The patients and caregivers experienced that this solution avoided hospitalisations and allowed them to maintain their lives, and this was described as less burdensome. As a result of these findings, this initiative has been continued with an ongoing focus on searching for possibilities aimed to prevent hospitalisations.

Indexed as

CaregiversCritical CareAged, 80 and overHospitalizationHumansPatient Care TeamPersonnel, Hospitalorganisation of health servicesprimary carequality in health care

Identifiers

PMID34389578
PMCPMC8365789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.