Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34389062›Full record

SynthesisGlobal health research and policy2021

Health-related quality of life in Chinese workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ya Su, Meng-Shuang Liu, Pinnaduwage Vijitha De Silva, Truls Østbye, Ke-Zhi Jin

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Global health research and policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of Copenhagen Adduction Exercise on Muscle Architecture and Adductor Flexibility.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ya SuDepartment of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, 138 Yixueyuan Road Box288#, Shanghai, 200032, P.R. China.
Meng-Shuang LiuDepartment of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, 138 Yixueyuan Road Box288#, Shanghai, 200032, P.R. China.
Pinnaduwage Vijitha De SilvaDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Galle, Sri Lanka.
Truls ØstbyeDuke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Ke-Zhi JinDepartment of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, 138 Yixueyuan Road Box288#, Shanghai, 200032, P.R. China. zhkjin@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4467-2303
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CNDuke Institute for Health Innovation · USUniversity of Ruhuna · LK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies of health-related quality of life among workers have generated varying results. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to synthesize the scores of health-related quality of life measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire among Chinese workers and compare the results across gender, age, occupation and region.

methodsSix databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, China Science and Technology Journal Database, PubMed, Web of science and Scopus were searched for relevant publications in both English and Chinese from their inception to February 2021. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established, and study and participant characters as well as health-related quality of life scores were extracted from included publications. Study quality was assessed by using the Crombie tool. The meta-analysis including individual publications used random-effects models. Subgroups analyses by gender, age, occupation and region were also conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity.

resultsOne hundred thirty-nine out of 1437 potential publications were included. The pooled mean scores of health-related quality of life were 14.1 for the physical domain (95%CI: 13.9-14.3), 13.7 for the psychological domain (95%CI: 13.5-13.8), 14.0 for the social relationship domain (95%CI: 13.8-14.2), 12.3 for the environment domain (95%CI: 12.1-12.5). No significant statistical difference was found between the different subgroups. Publication bias was present in the independence domain and the pooled scores were corrected to 15.0 (95%CI: 14.6-15.5) using the trim and fill method. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the results of the meta-analysis were stable. Region might be a source of heterogeneity. Workers in northeast China reported higher scores in the social relationship domain, and those in the central region reported lower scores in the environmental domain.

conclusionsChinese workers reported lower scores in four health-related quality of life domains than the general population. Region might be a potential influencing factor for workers' scores different, which needs further study. The pooled scores can served as benchmarks for workplace health promotion programes in Chinese workers and global occupational health studies.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeWorkplaceAsian PeopleChinaHumansWorld Health OrganizationChinaHealth-related quality of lifeMeta-analysisOccupational healthSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34389062
PMCPMC8361642
OpenAlexW3191153620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.