Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34389036›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2021

Clinical and radiological outcomes in three-dimensional printing assisted revision total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Rui Zhang, Jiajun Lin, Fenyong Chen, Wenge Liu, Min Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. [Early follow-up study on three-dimensional-printed customized porous acetabular components for reconstructing extensive acetabular bone defects in primary total hip arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. [Hip surgery: 3D printed implants in revision arthroplasty].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rui ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Xinquan Road No.29, Gulou District, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
Jiajun LinDepartment of Orthopaedics, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Xinquan Road No.29, Gulou District, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
Fenyong ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Xinquan Road No.29, Gulou District, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
Wenge LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Xinquan Road No.29, Gulou District, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China. 13566227010@163.com.
Min ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Xinquan Road No.29, Gulou District, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China. chenminfjxh@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-5193
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigates whether three-dimensional (3D) printing-assisted revision total hip/knee arthroplasty could improve its clinical and radiological outcomes and assess the depth and breadth of research conducted on 3D printing-assisted revision total hip and knee arthroplasty.

methodsA literature search was carried out on PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Only studies that investigated 3D printing-assisted revision total hip and knee arthroplasty were included. The author, publication year, study design, number of patients, patients' age, the time of follow-up, surgery category, Coleman score, clinical outcomes measured, clinical outcomes conclusion, radiological outcomes measured, and radiological outcomes conclusion were extracted and analyzed.

resultsTen articles were included in our review. Three articles investigated the outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty, and seven investigated the outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty. Two papers compared a 3D printing group with a control group, and the other eight reported 3D printing treatment outcomes alone. Nine articles investigated the clinical outcomes of total hip/knee arthroplasty, and eight studied the radiological outcomes of total hip/knee arthroplasty.

conclusion3D printing is being introduced in revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. Current literature suggests satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes could be obtained with the assistance of 3D printing. Further long-term follow-up studies are required, particularly focusing on cost-benefit analysis, resource availability, and, importantly, the durability and biomechanics of customized prostheses using 3D printing compared to traditional techniques.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeHumansKnee JointPrinting, Three-DimensionalReoperationRevision surgeryRevision total hip arthroplastyRevision total knee arthroplastySystematic reviewThree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID34389036
PMCPMC8362243
OpenAlexW3188998450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.