ArticleBMC medical education2021
Flexible e-learning video approach to improve fundus examination skills for medical students: a mixed-methods study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Educational videos as a teaching approach to enhance dental students' practical skills in preclinical courses.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Effective situation-based delirium simulation training using flipped classroom approach to improve interprofessional collaborative practice competency: a mixed-methods study.BMC medical education · 2022Trial
- Devising a Coaching Method for a Smartphone-Based Slit-Lamp Microscope and Its Learning Effects: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Trends in the Japanese National Medical Licensing Examination: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- The Use Of Fundus Photography In The Emergency Room-A Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Relationship between diagnostic accuracy and self-confidence among medical students when using Google search: A mixed-method study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Utilising accessible and reproducible neurological assessments in clinical studies: Insights from use of the Neurological Impairment Scale in the multi-centre COVID-CNS study.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2024Article
- Needs assessment for direct ophthalmoscopy training in neurology residency.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Assessing the effectiveness of a digital, case-based learning platform for cancer pain management in residency training.International journal of medical education · 2023Observational
- Evaluation of an Instructional Video and Simulation Model for Teaching Slit Lamp Examination to Medical Students.Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) · 2023Article
- A qualitative study examining the critical differences in the experience of and response to formative feedback by undergraduate medical students in Japan and the UK.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Understanding intention and use of digital elements in higher education teaching.Education and information technologies · 2023Article
- Investigating medical students' satisfaction towards video-based learning versus face-to-face lectures: a Jordanian tertiary teaching hospital experience.Korean journal of medical education · 2023Article
- Article
- The flipped classroom is effective for medical students to improve deep tendon reflex examination skills: A mixed-method study.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraining for the fundus examination using traditional teaching is challenging, resulting in low generalist physicians' confidence in performing the funduscopic examination. There is growing evidence suggesting a flexible e-learning video approach's value in teaching physical examination procedures. However, whether the flexible e-learning video approach is superior to the traditional, face-to-face (F2F) lecture-based teaching for the funduscopic exam and the cognitive processes supporting its effectiveness has not yet been determined.
methodsWe conducted a sequential explanatory mixed-method study to compare the flexible e-learning video approach's effectiveness versus the F2F lecture-based approach for teaching the funduscopic exam to medical students at Chiba University in Japan. Medical students were randomly assigned to either a flexible e-learning video approach group or a F2F lecture approach group. We then quantitatively measured the diagnostic accuracy of funduscopic findings before and after attending the specific classrooms. Next, we conducted student focus groups to explore the students' thinking processes in the flexible e-learning video approach vs. the F2F lecture-based teaching of fundus examination. The qualitative data were analyzed using the qualitative content analysis method.
resultsThe mean diagnostic accuracy scores in the post-test significantly increased from pre-test in the intervention group (36.6 to 63.4%, p < 0.001). Post-post comparisons across the two groups revealed a significant difference (intervention group 63.4% vs. control group 34.6%, p < 0.001). Six semi-structured focused group interviews were conducted (n = 36). In the flexible e-learning video approach group, we identified ten categories corresponding to four levels of the revised Bloom's taxonomy: remember, understand, apply, analyze. Five categories were identified in the traditional F2F lecture approach group corresponding to three revised Bloom's taxonomy levels: understand, apply, analyze. Interrater reliability was substantial (Cohen's kappa = 0.81).
conclusionsTeaching medical students funduscopic examination using the flexible e-learning video approach leads to improved diagnostic accuracy of funduscopic examinations. The flexible e-learning video teaching method enabled higher cognitive activity levels than the traditional, lecture-based classroom, as assessed using the revised Bloom's taxonomy.
trial registrationThis study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry on 08/02/2020 (Unique trial number: UMIN 000039434 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.