Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34388975›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2021

An artifıcial ıntelligence approach to automatic tooth detection and numbering in panoramic radiographs.

Elif Bilgir, İbrahim Şevki Bayrakdar, Özer Çelik, Kaan Orhan, Fatma Akkoca, Hande Sağlam, Alper Odabaş, Ahmet Faruk Aslan, Cemre Ozcetin, Musa Kıllı and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elif BilgirDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
İbrahim Şevki BayrakdarCenter of Research and Application for Computer Aided Diagnosis and Treatment in Health, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Özer ÇelikCenter of Research and Application for Computer Aided Diagnosis and Treatment in Health, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Kaan OrhanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Fatma AkkocaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Hande SağlamDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Alper OdabaşDepartment of Mathematics-Computer, Faculty of Science, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Ahmet Faruk AslanDepartment of Mathematics-Computer, Faculty of Science, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Cemre OzcetinPrivate Practice, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Musa KıllıFaculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Ingrid Rozylo-KalinowskaDepartment of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiodiagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Doktora Witolda Chodźki 6, 20-093, Lublin, Poland. rozylo.kalinowska@umlub.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-5162-1382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPanoramic radiography is an imaging method for displaying maxillary and mandibular teeth together with their supporting structures. Panoramic radiography is frequently used in dental imaging due to its relatively low radiation dose, short imaging time, and low burden to the patient. We verified the diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) system based on a deep convolutional neural network method to detect and number teeth on panoramic radiographs.

methodsThe data set included 2482 anonymized panoramic radiographs from adults from the archive of Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. A Faster R-CNN Inception v2 model was used to develop an AI algorithm (CranioCatch, Eskisehir, Turkey) to automatically detect and number teeth on panoramic radiographs. Human observation and AI methods were compared on a test data set consisting of 249 panoramic radiographs. True positive, false positive, and false negative rates were calculated for each quadrant of the jaws. The sensitivity, precision, and F-measure values were estimated using a confusion matrix.

resultsThe total numbers of true positive, false positive, and false negative results were 6940, 250, and 320 for all quadrants, respectively. Consequently, the estimated sensitivity, precision, and F-measure were 0.9559, 0.9652, and 0.9606, respectively.

conclusionsThe deep convolutional neural network system was successful in detecting and numbering teeth. Clinicians can use AI systems to detect and number teeth on panoramic radiographs, which may eventually replace evaluation by human observers and support decision making.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerRadiography, PanoramicAlgorithmsDatasets as TopicDeep LearningHumansSensitivity and SpecificityToothArtificial intelligenceDeep learningPanoramic radiographyTooth

Identifiers

PMID34388975
PMCPMC8361658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.