ReviewNursing open2021
The impact of intellectual disability nurse specialists in the United Kingdom and Eire Ireland: An integrative review.
Review in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Views and Experiences of Families and Registered Nurses Regarding Hospital Care and Support of Children With Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2026Pooled it
- Improving the health of people with intellectual disability: past progress and future directions.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Exploring Implementation of Reasonable Adjustments in Hospitals for People With Intellectual Disability: Using a Realist Lens.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Repeated use of hospital-based services and delayed hospital discharges in a population-based cohort of autistic adults in Canada.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2025Article
- Specialist intellectual disability liaison nurses in general hospitals in England: cohort study using a large mortality dataset.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Supporting the needs of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities 1 year into the COVID-19 pandemic: An international, mixed methods study of nurses' perspectives.Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities · 2022Article
- Article
- The impact of intellectual disability nurse specialists in the United Kingdom and Eire Ireland: An integrative review.Nursing open · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo identify and evaluate the impact of Intellectual Disability Nurse Specialists person-centred care for people with intellectual disability.
designAn Integrative review of the literature was performed between January 2007-December 2017.
methodsSearching the PubMed Library of Medicine, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline Ovid, PsychINFO, Health Source: Nursing/Academic edition. A total of eight articles were selected for the final study example, including four mixed methods studies and four qualitative studies.
resultsThree Intellectual Disability Nurse Specialist models were evaluated, and three main themes emerged: person-centred care, organizational and practice development.
conclusionThe Intellectual Disability Nurse Specialist expert knowledge and skills contribute to the development of effective systems and processes. The results highlighted the complex nature of the Intellectual Disability Nurse Specialist role and the importance of ongoing development, promotion and evaluation and their contribution to care in the healthcare setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.