Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34388459›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2021

Computational modeling of nasal nitric oxide flux from the paranasal sinuses: Validation against human experiment.

Barak M Spector, Dennis J Shusterman, Andrew N Goldberg, Edward M Weaver, Alexander A Farag, Bradley A Otto, Kai Zhao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Determinants of olfactory cleft targeting in intranasal aerosol delivery: a combined computational and experimental study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Barak M SpectorDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Dennis J ShustermanUpper Airway Biology Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Andrew N GoldbergDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Edward M WeaverDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, And Surgery Service, Seattle Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alexander A FaragDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Bradley A OttoDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kai ZhaoDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: zhao.1949@osu.edu.
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

Objective evaluation of conductive olfactory losses & nasal obstruction symptomsR01DC013626 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, KAI · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
Endoscopic nasal sinus surgery simulator to optimize treatment outcomeR21DC017530 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, KAI · 2019 to 2020
$442k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013626NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC017530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNitric oxide (NO) is important in respiratory physiology and airway defense. Although the paranasal sinuses are the major source of nasal NO, transport dynamics between the sinuses and nasal cavities are poorly understood.

methodsExhaled nasal NO tracings were measured in two non-asthmatic subjects (one with allergic rhinitis, one without) using NO analyzer connected via face mask. We subsequently performed computational fluid dynamics NO emission simulations based on individual CT scans and compared to the experimental data.

resultsSimulated exhaled NO tracings match well with experimental data (r > 0.84, p < 0.01) for both subjects, with measured peaks reaching 319.6 ppb in one subject (allergic-rhinitis), and 196.9 ppb in the other. The CFD simulation accurately captured the peak differences, even though the initial sinus NO concentration for both cases was set to the same 9000 ppb based on literature value. Further, the CFD simulation suggests that ethmoid sinuses contributed the most (>67%, other sinuses combined <33%) to total nasal NO emission in both cases and that diffusion contributes more than convective transport. By turning off diffusion (setting NO diffusivity to ~0), the NO emission peaks for both cases were reduced by >70%.

conclusionHistorically, nasal NO emissions were thought to be contributed mostly by the maxillary sinuses (the largest sinuses) and active air movement (convection). Here, we showed that the ethmoid sinuses and diffusive transport dominate the process. These findings may have a substantial impact on our view of nasal NO emission mechanisms and sinus physiopathology in general.

Indexed as

Nitric OxideParanasal SinusesExhalationHumansHydrodynamicsMaxillary SinusNasal CavityNitric OxideDiffusionNitric oxideNoseParanasal sinuses

Identifiers

PMID34388459
PMCPMC8440472
OpenAlexW3188536525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.