Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34388222›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Understanding a population: A methodology for a population-based coastal safety survey.

Jasmin C Lawes, Lea Uebelhoer, William Koon, Luke Strasiotto, Frederic Anne, Shane Daw, Robert W Brander, Nick Mulcahy, Amy E Peden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quantifying rip current-related drowning deaths and exposure on Australian beaches.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jasmin C LawesSurf Life Saving Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6652-3053
Lea UebelhoerSchool of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
William KoonSchool of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4708-4347
Luke StrasiottoSurf Life Saving Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2777-5178
Frederic AnneOmniPoll Market Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Shane DawSurf Life Saving Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Robert W BranderSchool of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nick MulcahySchool of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Amy E PedenBeach Safety Research Group, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6424-1511
UNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drowning is a global public health problem, but accurately estimating drowning risk remains a challenge. Coastal drowning comprises a significant proportion of the drowning burden in Australia and is influenced by a range of behavioural factors (e.g. risk perception, knowledge, attitudes and behaviours) that are poorly understood. These factors, along with those that impact exposure (e.g. coastal visitation and activity participation) all impact on drowning risk. While excellent mortality and morbidity data exists in Australia, a lack of coastal participation data presents challenges to identifying high-risk groups or activities and prioritising prevention efforts. This methods paper describes the development and evolution of an ongoing, annual, nationally representative online survey as an effective tool used to capture valuable data about the Australian population's relationship with the coast. This paper explores how the survey is structured (12-14 sections spanning multiple topics and themes), the different question types used (including open text, 4-digit responses and categorical questions), the sample size (1400-1600 respondents), sampling strategy (using demographic quota sampling which can then be post-weighted to the population if required) and how topics and themes have changed over time to enhance the quality of data collected (i.e., wording changes to enhance participant comprehension or data usability and changing issue-specific 'feature' topics of interest such as campaign evaluation). How the survey is implemented online is described, both practically through to third-party recruitment processes and ethically to maximise anonymity of respondents and ensure data quality. Interim analyses indicate the impact of considering exposure when calculating fatal drowning rates, especially by activity (e.g., crude boating drowning rate 0.12 per 100,000 population vs 0.95 per 100,000 exposed population [relative risk = 8.01; 95% confidence interval: 4.55-14.10]). This study highlights lessons learned in the process of conducting a nationally representative coastal participation survey as well as the strengths and limitations of adopting this approach. Data collected will provide more detailed information on the skills, behaviours, knowledge and attitudes of coastal activity participants. Analyses of this unique dataset will inform research that will underpin development and evaluation of coastal drowning prevention initiatives prioritising those most at risk. It is hoped that the methods detailed within this study may be useful for other countries to develop similar approaches to understanding their own population.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRisk-TakingSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAgedAttitudeAustraliaDivingDrowningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPublic HealthRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34388222
PMCPMC8362993
OpenAlexW3191612780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.