Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34388173›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Bandgap prediction of two-dimensional materials using machine learning.

Yu Zhang, Wenjing Xu, Guangjie Liu, Zhiyong Zhang, Jinlong Zhu, Meng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. When Machine Learning Meets 2D Materials: A Review.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  8. Predicting band gaps of ABNRSC advances · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yu ZhangDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun Normal University, Changchun, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4391-3371
Wenjing XuDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun Normal University, Changchun, China.
Guangjie LiuDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun Normal University, Changchun, China.
Zhiyong ZhangDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun Normal University, Changchun, China.
Jinlong ZhuDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun Normal University, Changchun, China.
Meng LiCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bandgap of two-dimensional (2D) materials plays an important role in their applications to various devices. For instance, the gapless nature of graphene limits the use of this material to semiconductor device applications, whereas the indirect bandgap of molybdenum disulfide is suitable for electrical and photo-device applications. Therefore, predicting the bandgap rapidly and accurately for a given 2D material structure has great scientific significance in the manufacturing of semiconductor devices. Compared to the extremely high computation cost of conventional first-principles calculations, machine learning (ML) based on statistics may be a promising alternative to predicting bandgaps. Although ML algorithms have been used to predict the properties of materials, they have rarely been used to predict the properties of 2D materials. In this study, we apply four ML algorithms to predict the bandgaps of 2D materials based on the computational 2D materials database (C2DB). Gradient boosted decision trees and random forests are more effective in predicting bandgaps of 2D materials with an R2 >90% and root-mean-square error (RMSE) of ~0.24 eV and 0.27 eV, respectively. By contrast, support vector regression and multi-layer perceptron show that R2 is >70% with RMSE of ~0.41 eV and 0.43 eV, respectively. Finally, when the bandgap calculated without spin-orbit coupling (SOC) is used as a feature, the RMSEs of the four ML models decrease greatly to 0.09 eV, 0.10 eV, 0.17 eV, and 0.12 eV, respectively. The R2 of all the models is >94%. These results show that the properties of 2D materials can be rapidly obtained by ML prediction with high precision.

Indexed as

Electric ConductivityMachine LearningModels, StatisticalSemiconductorsBoron CompoundsDatabases, ChemicalDisulfidesGraphiteMolybdenumBoron Compoundsboron nitrideDisulfidesGraphiteMolybdenummolybdenum disulfide

Identifiers

PMID34388173
PMCPMC8363013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.