Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34388159›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Psychometric characteristics of DLQI-BRA and Skindex-16 to measure the impact of dermatological diseases on quality of life in Brazilian patients.

Silmara Meneguin, Ticiane Dionozio de Souza Matos, Camila Fernandes Pollo, Miriane Garuzi, Hélio Amante Miot, César de Oliveira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Systematic Review of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measurement in Patients With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Silmara MeneguinNursing Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3853-5134
Ticiane Dionozio de Souza MatosNursing Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Camila Fernandes PolloNursing Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Miriane GaruziProgram in Pathophysiology in Medical Practice, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hélio Amante MiotDepartment of Dermatology and Radiotherapy, São Paulo State University, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
César de OliveiraDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the psychometric performance of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI-BRA) and Skindex-16 to assess quality of life (QoL) in Brazilian patients with dermatological diseases.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study carried out in a dermatology outpatient clinic of the São Paulo State University, with 188 patients with dermatological diseases. QoL was evaluated using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI-BRA) and Skindex-16. Cronbach's alpha and Intraclass Correlation for Perfect Concordance (ICC) were used to analyse the reliability and temporal stability, respectively.

resultsA positive correlation was found between the total Skindex-16 score and DLQI-BRA (0.75). Both instruments showed a significant (p< 0.01) reduction in their scores at the second assessment, demonstrating that they were sensitive in detecting changes in responsiveness in cases where there was a clinical change. Cronbach alpha coefficients for the instruments showed satisfactory performance (>0,7), but Skindex-16 displayed the highest Cronbach alpha (0.94; CI = 0.93-0.95).

conclusionBoth instruments tested showed a good psychometric performance assessing QoL in patients with skin dermatoses. The instruments displayed reliability and temporal stability as well as responsiveness.

Indexed as

PsychometricsQuality of LifeBrazilFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSkin DiseasesStatistics, NonparametricTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID34388159
PMCPMC8362944
OpenAlexW3188739392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.