Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34387826›Full record

Trial reportObesity surgery2021

Prophylactic Postoperative High Flow Nasal Oxygen Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery (OXYBAR Study): a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.

Rachel Fulton, Jonathan E Millar, Megan Merza, Helen Johnston, Amanda Corley, Daniel Faulke, Ivan L Rapchuk, Joe Tarpey, Jonathon P Fanning, Philip Lockie and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachel FultonDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth II University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Jonathan E MillarCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Rode Road, Brisbane, Queensland, 4032, Australia.
Megan MerzaSt. Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Helen JohnstonSt. Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Amanda CorleyCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Rode Road, Brisbane, Queensland, 4032, Australia.
Daniel FaulkeSt. Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Ivan L RapchukFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Joe TarpeySt. Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Jonathon P FanningCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Rode Road, Brisbane, Queensland, 4032, Australia.
Philip LockieSt. Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Shirley LockieSt. Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
John F FraserCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Rode Road, Brisbane, Queensland, 4032, Australia. fraserjohn001@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7012-2519
St Andrew’s Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AUGriffith University · AUPrince Charles Hospital · AURoslin Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with obesity are predisposed to a reduction in end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and atelectasis after anaesthesia. High flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) may increase EELV, reducing the likelihood of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). We conducted a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of conventional oxygen therapy versus HFNO after bariatric surgery. The aim was to investigate the feasibility of using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) as a means of assessing respiratory mechanics and to inform the design of a definitive RCT.

methodsWe performed a single-centre, parallel-group, pilot RCT. Adult patients with obesity undergoing elective bariatric surgery were eligible for inclusion. We excluded patients with a known contraindication to HFNO or with chronic lung disease.

resultsFifty patients were randomised in equal proportions. One patient crossed over from conventional O

conclusionsThese data suggest that a large-scale RCT of HFNO after bariatric surgery in an 'all-comers' population is likely infeasible. While EIT was an effective means of assessing respiratory mechanics, it was impractical over time. Similarly, the infrequency of PPC precludes its use as a primary outcome. Future studies should focus on identifying patients at the greatest risk of PPC.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidAdultHumansObesityOxygenPilot ProjectsOxygenAtelectasisMorbid obesityPostoperative complicationsPostoperative ventilation

Identifiers

PMID34387826
OpenAlexW3126872828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.