Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34387801›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022

Clinical experience with regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: insights into patient characteristics, safety, and impact of results on clinical management.

Karthikeyan Ananthasubramaniam, Matthew Saval, Meredith Van Harn, Therese M Kitt, Rita M Kristy, Yanqing Xu, James R Spalding

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Safety and tolerability of pharmacologic stress with the selective AClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karthikeyan AnanthasubramaniamHeart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford West Bloomfield Hospital, 6777 West Maple, West Bloomfield, MI, 48322, USA. kananth1@hfhs.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5837-496X
Matthew SavalHeart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford West Bloomfield Hospital, 6777 West Maple, West Bloomfield, MI, 48322, USA.
Meredith Van HarnDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Therese M KittAstellas Pharma Global Development, Northbrook, IL, USA.
Rita M KristyAstellas Pharma Global Development, Northbrook, IL, USA.
Yanqing XuAstellas Pharma Global Development, Northbrook, IL, USA.
James R SpaldingAstellas Pharma Global Development, Northbrook, IL, USA.
Astellas Pharma (United States) · USHenry Ford Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Henry Ford Hospital (HFH) regadenoson (REG) registry includes patients with a variety of comorbidities allowing for the evaluation of outcomes in a large, unselected population. Using a database of electronic medical records and nuclear cardiology reports, patients aged > 18 years who underwent REG-facilitated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) testing at HFH between January 2009 and August 2012 were identified. The primary objective was to describe the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients who had undergone REG only vs REG WALK (REG + low-level exercise) SPECT. A total of 2104 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 65.3 years; 50% women; 51% African American, 43% Caucasian). For the REG only (n = 1318) and REG WALK (n = 786) cohorts, SPECT was abnormal in 37% of patients (REG only, 39%; REG WALK, 34%; P < 0.01). No differences in diagnostic modalities or interventions in 90 days after SPECT were observed. Immediate safety analysis showed no deaths 48 h after REG SPECT testing. Although they guide invasive therapy, abnormal scans do not automatically lead to invasive testing. This demonstrates the focus on initial medical management, which reflects the existing evidence of initial goal-directed medical management of stable coronary disease.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial Perfusion ImagingAdolescentAgedExercise TestFemaleHumansMalePerfusionPredictive Value of TestsPurinesPyrazolesTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonPurinesPyrazolesregadenosonCoronary artery diseasePharmacological stress agentRegadenosonSingle-photon emission computed tomographyStress testing outcomes

Identifiers

PMID34387801
OpenAlexW3187763059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.