Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34387775›Full record

SynthesisCurrent allergy and asthma reports2021

Efficacy and Safety of Prostaglandin D2 Receptor 2 Antagonism with Fevipiprant for Patients with Asthma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Dan Yang, Xinning Guo, Ting Liu, Yina Li, Zhuman Du, Chuntao Liu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dan YangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine and West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, West China, China.
Xinning GuoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine and West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, West China, China.
Ting LiuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine and West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, West China, China.
Yina LiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine and West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, West China, China.
Zhuman DuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine and West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, West China, China.
Chuntao LiuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine and West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, West China, China. liuchuntaoscu@163.com.
West China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAccumulating evidence has shown that prostaglandin D2 (PGD2)-chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTH2) pathway plays an important role in promoting eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthma. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CRTH2 antagonist fevipiprant in patients with persistent asthma compared with placebo. RECENT

findingsWe identified eligible studies by searching PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov. The study was registered as CRD 42020221714 ( http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO ). Ten randomized controlled trials with 7902 patients met our inclusion criteria. A statistically significant benefit of fevipiprant compared with placebo was shown in improving forced expiratory volume in 1 s (MD 0.05 L, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.07; p < 0.0001), Asthma Control Questionnaire score (MD -0.10, 95% CI: -0.16 to -0.04; p = 0.001), and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score (MD 0.08, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.13; p = 0.003). Fevipiprant decreased number of patients with at least one asthma exacerbation requiring administration of systemic corticosteroids for 3 days or more (RR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.97; p = 0.01). Some benefits were a little more pronounced in the high eosinophil population (with an elevated blood eosinophil count or sputum eosinophil percentage) and in the 450 mg dose group. Fevipiprant was well tolerated with no safety issues compared with placebo. Fevipiprant could safely improve asthma outcomes compared to placebo. However, most of the differences didn't reach the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), thus the clinical benefits remained to be confirmed.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaHumansIndoleacetic AcidsPyridinesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, ProstaglandinAnti-Asthmatic AgentsfevipiprantIndoleacetic Acidsprostaglandin D2 receptorPyridinesReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, ProstaglandinAsthmaBiologicsDP2 receptorFevipiprantProstaglandin D2Randomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID34387775
OpenAlexW3189069311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.