Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34387714›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2022

[Structuring emergency management in nursing homes: Results of interprofessional focus group interviews].

Sven Schwabe, Jutta Bleidorn, Andreas Günther, Olaf Krause, Nils Schneider, Juliane Poeck

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cost-benefit analysis of the CoCare intervention to improve medical care in long-term care nursing homes: an analysis based on claims data.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Article
  2. [Advance Directives and Palliative Medical Care in Nursing Homes: A Study on Everyday Life and Relevance in Out-of-Hours Medical Care].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sven SchwabeInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin und Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. schwabe.sven@mh-hannover.de.
Jutta BleidornInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
Andreas GüntherFachbereich Feuerwehr, Stadt Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Deutschland.
Olaf KrauseInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin und Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Nils SchneiderInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin und Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Juliane PoeckInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergencies in nursing homes lead to frequent utilization of emergency medical services and emergency department visits, which are frequently assessed as avoidable and do not comply with the patients' wishes. Emergency management is complicated by structural conditions, uncertainty and difficulties in communication between the treating healthcare professionals.

objectiveIn the framework of the NOVELLE research project a model for a recommendation for action was developed in an interprofessional process to structure the emergency management in nursing homes. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe research process was organized according to the grounded theory as a constant interplay of data collection, analysis and concept development. From January to April 2021 a total of 6 focus group interviews were conducted with 24 nurses, physicians and experts from medical ethics and 1 guideline interview with an expert from the field of medical law. All interviews were performed as video conferences. They were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded with MAXQDA software.

resultsRecommendations for organizing and improving the emergency management are structured into three components: 1) initial assessment, 2) structured assessment including nursing evaluation and integration of patient treatment preferences and 3) organization of further treatment. Components include actions, results and consequences and can be arranged in the form of an algorithm. DISCUSSION: Recommendations for improvement of emergency management should enhance the competences of nursing staff, respect patient treatment preferences, consider situational conditions and support communication with external medical and care providers.

Indexed as

Nursing StaffPhysiciansCommunicationEmergency Service, HospitalFocus GroupsHumansNursing HomesEmergencyNursing homeParamedicsQualitative methodsRecommendations of action

Identifiers

PMID34387714
PMCPMC9587113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.