Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34387675›Full record

SynthesisHuman reproduction update2021

The effects of bariatric surgery on periconception maternal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Katinka M Snoek, Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen, Eric J Hazebroek, Sten P Willemsen, Sander Galjaard, Joop S E Laven, Sam Schoenmakers

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human reproduction update, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Weight management in women of reproductive age.Obesity and endocrinology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Breastfeeding in metabolic and bariatric patients: a comprehensive guide for surgeons, patients, and the multidisciplinary team.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katinka M SnoekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre , Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2732-9688
Régine P M Steegers-TheunissenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre , Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4353-5756
Eric J HazebroekDepartment of Surgery, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Sten P WillemsenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre , Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sander GaljaardDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre , Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joop S E LavenDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sam SchoenmakersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre , Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0316-6159
Erasmus MC · NLRijnstate Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide, the prevalence of obesity in women of reproductive age is increasing. Bariatric surgery is currently viewed as the most effective, long-term solution for this problem. Preconception bariatric surgery can reduce the prevalence of obesity-related subfertility and adverse maternal, pregnancy and birth outcomes. Maternal health during the periconception period is crucial for optimal gametogenesis and for embryonic and fetal development which also affects health in the later lives of both mother and offspring. Although preconception bariatric surgery improves several pregnancy outcomes, it can also increase the prevalence of pregnancy complications due to excessive and rapid weight loss. This can lead to iatrogenic malnutrition with vitamin deficiencies and derangements in metabolic and endocrine homeostasis. Thus, bariatric surgery can greatly influence periconception maternal health with consequences for reproduction, pregnancy and health in later life. However, its influence on periconception maternal health itself has never been reviewed systematically. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The aim of this review was to investigate associations between bariatric surgery and determinants of periconception maternal health such as endocrine changes, fertility, vitamin status, irregular menstrual cycles, miscarriages and congenital malformations. SEARCH

methodsMedline, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and the Cochrane databases were used for the literature search until 1 November 2020. The search strategy terms included, among others, bariatric surgery, hormones, fertility, malformations, miscarriages and vitamin status. We searched for human studies that were written in English. Abstracts, reviews, meta-analyses and conference papers were excluded. The ErasmusAGE score was used to assess the quality of the included studies. OUTCOMES: A total of 51 articles were analysed. The mean quality score was 5 (range 2-8). After bariatric surgery, hormonal axes normalized and menstrual cycle regularity was restored, resulting in increased fertility. Overall, there were no short-term risks for reproductive outcomes such as the increased risk of miscarriages or congenital malformations. However, the risk of vitamin deficiencies was generally increased after bariatric surgery. A meta-analysis of 20 studies showed a significant decrease in infertility (risk difference (RD) -0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.42, -0.05) and menstrual cycle irregularities (RD -0.24, 95% CI -0.34, -0.15) with no difference in rates of miscarriage (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.09, 0.10) and congenital malformations (RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.02, 0.03). WIDER IMPLICATIONS: The current systematic review and meta-analysis show associations between bariatric surgery and periconception maternal health and underlines the need for providing and personalizing preconception care for women after bariatric surgery. We recommend preconception care including the recommendation of postponing pregnancy until weight loss has stabilized, irrespective of the surgery-to-pregnancy interval, and until vitamin status is normalized. Therefore, regular monitoring of vitamin status and vitamin supplementation to restore deficiencies is recommended. Furthermore, this systematic review emphasizes the need for a long-term follow-up research of these women from the periconception period onwards as well as their pregnancies and offspring, to further improve care and outcomes of these mothers and children.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryPregnancy ComplicationsChildFemaleHumansMaternal HealthObesityPregnancyPregnancy Outcomeabortionbariatric surgerycongenital malformationsfemale infertilityhormonesmalnutritionmenstrual cyclepericonceptionpregnancyvitamins

Identifiers

PMID34387675
PMCPMC8542997
OpenAlexW3193137803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.