ArticleBlood advances2021
A predictive algorithm using clinical and laboratory parameters may assist in ruling out and in diagnosing MDS.
Article in Blood advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Derivation of a blood count-based machine learning model to prioritise sequencing for high-risk clonal haematopoiesis: a retrospective cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Biomarkers and advances in AML-MRC: from bench to bedside.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Observational
- Can we identify individuals at risk to develop multiple myeloma? A machine learning-based predictive model.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes: the classic and the novel.Haematologica · 2025Review
- Article
- MDS patient registries - achievements and challenges.Annals of hematology · 2024Review
- Parallel genomic analysis from paired bone marrow and peripheral blood samples of 200 cytopenic patients.Leukemia · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in myelodysplastic neoplasms.Leukemia · 2024Article
- How we diagnose Myelodysplastic syndromes.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Patterns of Diagnostic Evaluation and Determinants of Treatment in Older Patients With Non-transfusion Dependent Myelodysplastic Syndromes.The oncologist · 2023Article
- Prediction of risk for myeloid malignancy in clonal hematopoiesis.NEJM evidence · 2023Article
- Lymphoid aggregates in the bone marrow biopsies of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes - A potential prognostic marker?Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a noninvasive Web-based app to help exclude or diagnose myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), a bone marrow (BM) disorder with cytopenias and leukemic risk, diagnosed by BM examination. A sample of 502 MDS patients from the European MDS (EUMDS) registry (n > 2600) was combined with 502 controls (all BM proven). Gradient-boosted models (GBMs) were used to predict/exclude MDS using demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the models, and performance was validated using 100 times fivefold cross-validation. Model stability was assessed by repeating its fit using different randomly chosen groups of 502 EUMDS cases. AUC was 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.95-0.97). MDS is predicted/excluded accurately in 86% of patients with unexplained anemia. A GBM score (range, 0-1) of less than 0.68 (GBM < 0.68) resulted in a negative predictive value of 0.94, that is, MDS was excluded. GBM ≥ 0.82 provided a positive predictive value of 0.88, that is, MDS. The diagnosis of the remaining patients (0.68 ≤ GBM < 0.82) is indeterminate. The discriminating variables: age, sex, hemoglobin, white blood cells, platelets, mean corpuscular volume, neutrophils, monocytes, glucose, and creatinine. A Web-based app was developed; physicians could use it to exclude or predict MDS noninvasively in most patients without a BM examination. Future work will add peripheral blood cytogenetics/genetics, EUMDS-based prospective validation, and prognostication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.