ArticleEar and hearing
Preserving Wideband Tympanometry Information With Artifact Mitigation.
Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Rise and Fall of Aural Acoustic Immittance Assessment Tools.Seminars in hearing · 2023Review
- Characteristics of large vestibular aqueduct syndrome in wideband acoustic immittance.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAbsorbance measured using wideband tympanometry (WBT) has been shown to be sensitive to changes in middle and inner ear mechanics, with potential to diagnose various mechanical ear pathologies. However, artifacts in absorbance due to measurement noise can obscure information related to pathologies and increase intermeasurement variability. Published reports frequently present absorbance that has undergone smoothing to minimize artifact; however, smoothing changes the true absorbance and can destroy important narrow-band characteristics such as peaks and notches at different frequencies. Because these characteristics can be unique to specific pathologies, preserving them is important for diagnostic purposes. Here, we identify the cause of artifacts in absorbance and develop a technique to mitigate artifacts while preserving the underlying WBT information.
designA newly developed Research Platform for the Interacoustics Titan device allowed us to study raw microphone recordings and corresponding absorbances obtained by WBT measurements. We investigated WBT measurements from normal hearing ears and ears with middle and inner ear pathologies for the presence of artifact and noise. Furthermore, it was used to develop an artifact mitigation procedure and to evaluate its effectiveness in mitigating artifacts without distorting the true WBT information.
resultsWe observed various types of noise that can plague WBT measurements and that contribute to artifacts in computed absorbances, particularly intermittent low-frequency noise. We developed an artifact mitigation procedure that incorporates a high-pass filter and a Tukey window. This artifact mitigation resolved the artifacts from low-frequency noise while preserving characteristics in absorbance in both normal hearing ears and ears with pathology. Furthermore, the artifact mitigation reduced intermeasurement variability.
conclusionsUnlike smoothing algorithms used in the past, our artifact mitigation specifically removes artifacts caused by noise. It does not change frequency response characteristics, such as narrow-band peaks and notches in absorbance at different frequencies that can be important for diagnosis. Also, by reducing intermeasurement variability, the artifact mitigation can improve the test-retest reliability of these measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.