Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34387429›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2021

[Effectiveness of robot assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty for treatment of single/double-segment osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures].

Wei Yuan, Xiaotong Meng, Xinchun Liu, Haitao Zhu, Lin Cong, Yue Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [History and trends of robot-assisted spine surgery].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei YuanDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang Liaoning, 110001, P.R.China.
Xiaotong MengDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang Liaoning, 110001, P.R.China.
Xinchun LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang Liaoning, 110001, P.R.China.
Haitao ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang Liaoning, 110001, P.R.China.
Lin CongDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang Liaoning, 110001, P.R.China.
Yue ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang Liaoning, 110001, P.R.China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effectiveness of robot assisted and C-arm assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of single/double-segment osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF).

methodsThe clinical data of 108 cases of single/double-segment OVCF who met the selection criteria between May 2018 and October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 65 cases of single-segment fractures, of which 38 cases underwent "TiRobot" orthopedic robot-assisted PKP (robot group), 27 cases underwent C-arm X-ray machine fluoroscopy-assisted PKP (C-arm group). There were 43 cases of double-segment fractures, including 21 cases in robot group and 22 cases in C-arm group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, T value of bone mineral density, fracture segment distribution, time from injury to operation, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, vertebral kyphosis angle (VKA), and height of fractured vertebra (HFV) in the patients with single/double-segments fractures between robot group and C-arm group (

resultsAll patients underwent surgery successfully. The operation time of the single-segment robot group was significantly longer than that of the C-arm group (

conclusionFor single/double-segment OVCF, robot assisted PKP has more advantages in correcting VKA and HFV, reducing fluoroscopy exposure of surgeons and bone cement leakage rate; C-arm assisted PKP has more advantages in reducing the operation time of single-segment OVCF and fluoroscopy exposure of patients during operation.

Indexed as

Fractures, CompressionKyphoplastyOsteoporotic FracturesRoboticsSpinal FracturesBone CementsHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBone Cementsosteoporotic vertebral compression fracturePercutaneous kyphoplastyrobot

Identifiers

PMID34387429
PMCPMC8404010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.