Fluid and protein exchange in microvascular networks: Importance of modelling heterogeneity in geometrical and biophysical properties.

key pointsMicrovascular network architecture defines coupling of fluid and protein exchange. Network arrangements markedly reduce capillary hydrostatic pressures and resting fluid movement at the same time as increasing the capacity for change The presence of vascular remodelling or angiogenesis puts constraints of network behaviour The sites of fluid and protein exchange can be segregated to different portions of the network Although there is a net filtration of fluid from a network of exchange vessels, there are specific areas where fluid moves into the circulation (reabsorption) and, when protein is moving into tissue, the amount is insufficient under basal conditions to result in changes in oncotic pressure. ABSTRACT: Integration of functional results obtained across scales, from chemical signalling to the whole organism, is a daunting task requiring the marriage of experimental data with mathematical modelling. In the present study, a novel coupled computational fluid dynamics model is developed incorporating fluid and protein transport using measurements in an in vivo frog (Rana pipiens) mesenteric microvascular network. The influences of network architecture and exchange are explored systematically under the common assumptions of structurally and functionally identical microvessels (Homogeneous Scenario) or microvessels classified by position in flow (Class Uniform Scenario), which are compared with realistic microvascular network components (Heterogeneous Scenario). The model incorporates ten quantities that vary within a microvessel; pressure boundary conditions are calibrated against experimental measurements. The Homogeneous Scenario standard model showed that assuming a single 'typical' capillary hides the influence of vessels arranged into a network architecture, where capillary hydrostatic pressures (p