Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34387047›Full record

ArticleJournal of periodontal & implant science2021

Chemical cleansing as an adjunct to subgingival instrumentation with ultrasonic and hand devices in deep periodontal pockets: a randomized controlled study.

Fahad Zafar, Federica Romano, Filippo Citterio, Francesco Ferrarotti, Claudia Dellavia, Moontaek Chang, Mario Aimetti

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of periodontal & implant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Fahad ZafarDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin C.I.R. Dental School, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4404-5924
Federica RomanoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin C.I.R. Dental School, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5172-299X
Filippo CitterioDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin C.I.R. Dental School, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4513-7479
Francesco FerrarottiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin C.I.R. Dental School, Turin, Italy.
Claudia DellaviaDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5145-3606
Moontaek ChangDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin C.I.R. Dental School, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0328-6572
Mario AimettiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin C.I.R. Dental School, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0657-0787
Department of Medical Sciences · BYUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

Jeonbuk National University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this randomized clinical trial was to assess whether chemical cleansing using a sulfonic/sulfuric acid gel solution (HBX) as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) resulted in a decrease in residual plaque and calculus in deep periodontal pockets compared to SRP alone.

methodsFifty-six patients with 56 hopeless posterior teeth, scheduled for extraction due to severe periodontitis, were enrolled in this study. Each tooth was randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 experimental procedures. The test teeth were subjected to the irrigation of the subgingival area with HBX for 2 minutes, followed by SRP with hand and ultrasonic instruments for 14 minutes, and then extracted. The control teeth received only mechanical instrumentation before extraction. Residual biofilm was evaluated on photographs and measured as total area and percentage of root surface covered by remaining plaque (RP) or calculus (RC) after treatment.

resultsThe initial pocket depth (PD) and total subgingival root surface area were similar between the 2 treatment groups. After treatment, the total subgingival root area covered by RP and RC was statistically significantly larger (

conclusionsThe additional chemical cleansing with HBX resulted in a statistically significant improvement in bacterial plaque removal during SRP of deep pockets, but it was not effective in reducing calculus deposits.

Indexed as

DecontaminationDental calculusPeriodontitisRoot planingSulfates

Identifiers

PMID34387047
PMCPMC8367643
OpenAlexW3166549395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.