Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34386908›Full record

ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2021

Biorelevant In Vitro Skin Permeation Testing and In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Characterization of Lidocaine from a Nonaqueous Drug-in-Matrix Topical System.

Emileigh Greuber, Kip Vought, Kalpana Patel, Hiroaki Suzuki, Kazuhiro Usuda, Akira Shiramizu, Luana Pesco Koplowitz, Barry Koplowitz, Howard I Maibach, Dmitri Lissin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emileigh GreuberScilex Pharmaceuticals Inc., 960 San Antonio Road, Suite 100, Palo Alto, California, 94303, USA.
Kip VoughtScilex Pharmaceuticals Inc., 960 San Antonio Road, Suite 100, Palo Alto, California, 94303, USA.
Kalpana PatelScilex Pharmaceuticals Inc., 960 San Antonio Road, Suite 100, Palo Alto, California, 94303, USA.
Hiroaki SuzukiOishi Koseido Co., Ltd., Pharmaceutical Development Center, Tosu, Japan.
Kazuhiro UsudaOishi Koseido Co., Ltd., Pharmaceutical Development Center, Tosu, Japan.
Akira ShiramizuOishi Koseido Co., Ltd., Pharmaceutical Development Center, Tosu, Japan.
Luana Pesco KoplowitzDuck Flats Pharma, Flemington, New Jersey, USA.
Barry KoplowitzDuck Flats Pharma, Flemington, New Jersey, USA.
Howard I MaibachDermatology Department, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Dmitri LissinScilex Pharmaceuticals Inc., 960 San Antonio Road, Suite 100, Palo Alto, California, 94303, USA. dlissin@scilexpharma.com.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, lidocaine topical systems utilizing nonaqueous matrices have been developed and provide efficient lidocaine delivery through the skin, such that lower concentrations of drug provide equivalent or greater drug delivery than drug-in-matrix hydrogel lidocaine patches. This study characterizes drug delivery from a nonaqueous lidocaine topical system with increasing drug load both in vitro and in vivo. Topical systems formulated with either 1.8% or 5.4% lidocaine were applied to healthy volunteers' backs (n = 15) for 12 h in a single-center, open-label, four-treatment, four-period crossover pharmacokinetic study. Subjects were dosed with either three 1.8% systems or one, two, or three 5.4% systems in each period. Blood was collected for up to 48 h, and plasma lidocaine levels were measured with a validated HPLC method. In parallel, human and mouse skin models characterized the in vitro skin permeation profile. The pharmacokinetic profile was linear between one, two, and three lidocaine 5.4% applications. Application of three lidocaine 1.8% systems (108 mg lidocaine) was bioequivalent to one lidocaine 5.4% system (108 mg lidocaine). Both topical systems remained well adhered to the skin and irritation was mild. The 5.4% system had approximately threefold higher skin permeability than the 1.8% system in the mouse and human skin models. The results indicate increasing the drug load by three times results in triple the drug delivery both in vivo and in vitro. The relationship between the in vitro permeation and in vivo absorption correlates and is nonlinear.

Indexed as

LidocainePharmaceutical PreparationsAdministration, CutaneousAnimalsFemaleMaleMicePermeabilitySkinSkin AbsorptionLidocainePharmaceutical Preparationsin vitro permeation test (IVPT)lidocainepharmacokineticsTS (topical system)

Identifiers

PMID34386908
PMCPMC8360843
OpenAlexW3191983451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.