Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34386854›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2021

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography part 2: urethral imaging.

Carol E Barnewolt, Patricia T Acharya, Elisa Aguirre Pascual, Susan J Back, Vivian P Beltrán Salazar, Pui Kwan Joyce Chan, Jeanne S Chow, David Coca Robinot, Kassa Darge, Carmina Duran and 6 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Contrast-Enhanced Voiding Urosonography for Diagnosis of Ectopic Ureters in Five Female Dogs.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Imaging of the pelvic floor : The urological perspective].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Carol E BarnewoltDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard University, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, USA. Carol.Barnewolt@childrens.harvard.edu.
Patricia T AcharyaDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Elisa Aguirre PascualDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Susan J BackDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Vivian P Beltrán SalazarDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Pui Kwan Joyce ChanDepartment of Radiology, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong (SAR), People's Republic of China.
Jeanne S ChowDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard University, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
David Coca RobinotDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Kassa DargeDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Carmina DuranDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Damjana KljučevšekDepartment of Radiology, University Children's Hospital Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jeannie K KwonDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Aikaterini NtouliaDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9853-4873
Frederica PapadopoulouPediatric Ultrasound Center, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Magdalena M WoźniakDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Maciej PiskunowiczDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USBoston Children's Hospital · USHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESDuchess of Kent Children's Hospital · CNGdańsk Medical University · PLLjubljana University Medical Centre · SIMedical University of Lublin · PLThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) has been increasingly used as an important imaging tool to assess the urethra in children. The earliest reports of pediatric urethral sonography involved imaging the urethra in a non-voiding state, during physiological voiding of urine, and after instillation of saline. The introduction of US contrast agents has continued to improve visualization of urethral anatomy. Contrast-enhanced US of the urethra can be performed during the voiding phase of a standard contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) exam or with retrograde instillation of a contrast agent, depending on the exam indication. Both techniques are well tolerated by children and provide accurate information about urethral pathology and periurethral soft tissues. This article reviews the technical aspects and imaging findings of urethral pathologies in children using contrast-enhanced US, both by the voiding and retrograde instillation techniques.

Indexed as

UrethraUrinationChildContrast MediaDiagnostic ImagingHumansMaleUltrasonographyContrast MediaChildrenContrast-enhanced retrograde urethrosonographyContrast-enhanced voiding urosonographySuprapubicTransperinealUltrasoundUltrasound contrast agentsUrethra

Identifiers

PMID34386854
OpenAlexW3192500875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.