Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34386791›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2021

Effectiveness of CoronaVac among healthcare workers in the setting of high SARS-CoV-2 Gamma variant transmission in Manaus, Brazil: A test-negative case-control study.

Matt D T Hitchings, Otavio T Ranzani, Mario Sergio Scaramuzzini Torres, Silvano Barbosa de Oliveira, Maria Almiron, Rodrigo Said, Ryan Borg, Wade L Schulz, Roberto Dias de Oliveira, Patricia Vieira da Silva and 13 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 124 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05508477 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Controlled, Phase III Clinical Trial (Immunobridging Study) of Vaksin Merah Putih - UA SARS-CoV-2 (Vero Cell Inactivated) in Healthy Population Aged 18 Years and Above

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr. Soetomo General HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled4,005ConditionsCOVID-19 Pandemic, COVID-19 VaccinesArmsVaksin Merah Putih - UA SARS-CoV-2 (Vero Cell Inactivated) 5 µg, CoronaVac Biofarma COVID-19 Vaccine
NCT06282692 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

An Open Label, Phase III Clinical Trial (Immunobridging Study) of INAVAC (Vaksin Merah Putih - UA-SARS CoV-2 (Vero Cell Inactivated)) in Healthy Population Aged 12 to 17 Years Old

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr. Soetomo General HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled400ConditionsCOVID-19 Pandemic, COVID-19 VaccinesArmsINAVAC (Vaksin Merah Putih - UA-SARS CoV-2 (Vero Cell Inactivated) 5 µg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Antibody Response in Healthcare Workers During the SARS-CoV-2 Gamma Variant Outbreak in Manaus, Brazil.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Observational
  19. Review
  20. Review

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Matt D T HitchingsDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Otavio T RanzaniPulmonary Division, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Mario Sergio Scaramuzzini TorresMunicipal Health Secretary of Manaus, Brazil, AM, Brazil.
Silvano Barbosa de OliveiraPan American Health Organization, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Maria AlmironPan American Health Organization, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Rodrigo SaidPan American Health Organization, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Ryan BorgDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Wade L SchulzCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.
Roberto Dias de OliveiraState University of Mato Grosso do Sul - UEMS, Dourados, MS, Brazil.
Patricia Vieira da SilvaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul - UFMS, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
Daniel Barros de CastroFundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brazil.
Vanderson de Souza SampaioFundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brazil.
Bernardino Cláudio de AlbuquerqueFundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brazil.
Tatyana Costa Amorim RamosFundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brazil.
Shadia Hussami Hauache FraxeMunicipal Health Secretary of Manaus, Brazil, AM, Brazil.
Cristiano Fernandes da CostaFundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brazil.
Felipe Gomes NavecaFiocruz, Instituto Leônidas e Maria Deane, Manaus, AM, Brazil.
Andre M SiqueiraInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Carlos Chagas-Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Wildo Navegantes de AraújoPan American Health Organization, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Jason R AndrewsDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Derek A T CummingsDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Albert I KoDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Julio CrodaDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Fundação de Medicina Tropical · BRPan American Health Organization (Brasil) · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRUniversity of Florida · USYale University · USFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRStanford University · USUniversidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRYale New Haven Hospital · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant, Gamma, emerged in the city of Manaus in late 2020 during a large resurgence of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and has spread throughout Brazil. The effectiveness of vaccines in settings with widespread Gamma variant transmission has not been reported.

methodsWe performed a matched test-negative case-control study to estimate the effectiveness of an inactivated vaccine, CoronaVac, in healthcare workers (HCWs) in Manaus, where the Gamma variant accounted for 86% of genotyped SARS-CoV-2 samples at the peak of its epidemic. We performed an early analysis of effectiveness following administration of at least one vaccine dose and an analysis of effectiveness of the two-dose schedule. The primary outcome was symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

findingsFor the early at-least-one-dose and two-dose analyses the study population was, respectively, 53,176 and 53,153 HCWs residing in Manaus and aged 18 years or older, with complete information on age, residence, and vaccination status. Among 53,153 HCWs eligible for the two-dose analysis, 47,170 (89%) received at least one dose of CoronaVac and 2,656 individuals (5%) underwent RT-PCR testing from 19 January, 2021 to 13 April, 2021. Of 3,195 RT-PCR tests, 885 (28%) were positive. 393 and 418 case-control pairs were selected for the early and two-dose analyses, respectively, matched on calendar time, age, and neighbourhood. Among those who had received both vaccine doses before the RT-PCR sample collection date, the average time from second dose to sample collection date was 14 days (IQR 7-24). In the early analysis, vaccination with at least one dose was associated with a 0.50-fold reduction (adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE), 49.6%, 95% CI 11.3 to 71.4) in the odds of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection during the period 14 days or more after receiving the first dose. However, we estimated low effectiveness (adjusted VE 36.8%, 95% CI -54.9 to 74.2) of the two-dose schedule against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection during the period 14 days or more after receiving the second dose. A finding that vaccinated individuals were much more likely to be infected than unvaccinated individuals in the period 0-13 days after first dose (aOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.36-3.27) suggests that unmeasured confounding led to downward bias in the vaccine effectiveness estimate.

interpretationEvidence from this test-negative study of the effectiveness of CoronaVac was mixed, and likely affected by bias in this setting. Administration of at least one vaccine dose showed effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in the setting of epidemic Gamma variant transmission. However, the low estimated effectiveness of the two-dose schedule underscores the need to maintain non-pharmaceutical interventions while vaccination campaigns with CoronaVac are being implemented.

fundingFundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz); Municipal Health Secretary of Manaus; Fundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Amazonas.

Indexed as

Brazilcase-control studyCoronaVacCOVID-19P.1 varianttest-negative study

Identifiers

PMID34386791
PMCPMC8310555
OpenAlexW3185577988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.