Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34386547›Full record

ArticleOncoscience2021

Determining the utility of a screening program to reduce the incidence of HPV driven oropharyngeal cancer.

Sarju Vasani, Ian Frazer, Chamindie Punyadeera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarju VasaniDepartment of Otolaryngology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia.
Ian FrazerFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Chamindie PunyadeeraTranslational Research Institute, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last decade has seen a continued escalation in rates of human papillomavirus related oropharyngeal malignancy (HPV-OPC). This has occurred despite established national vaccination programs. In contrast, HPV associated cervical cancer incidence rates have declined, due in part to effective cervical cancer screening programs, many of which have moved towards the detection of high-risk HPV (hrHPV) as an early marker of malignant potential. This raises questions as to whether similar hrHPV screening methods could be used for early detection of HPV-OPC. Persistent oral hrHPV is a prerequisite for the development of HPV-OPC and can be accurately detected in saliva. Despite this, single point saliva testing for hrHPV lacks sufficient sensitivity and specificity to allow for effective population screening. Recent published literature suggests the use of serial saliva testing in targeted high-risk individuals, with an emphasis on biomarker persistence and intensity patterns, as a potential means of detecting even subclinical microscopic disease. When coupled with serological testing, this has the potential to provide an accurate test for screening at risk individuals. Despite these promising developments, several significant barriers to an effective targeted screening program remain.

Indexed as

early detectionhuman papillomavirusoropharyngeal cancersalivascreening

Identifiers

PMID34386547
PMCPMC8351916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.